2015
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of interstitial brachytherapy and surgery as primary treatments for nasal vestibule carcinomas

Abstract: 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The definite inclusion of such recommendation in the guidelines will anyway require further prospective studies in larger series. Furthermore, we feel that many of the peculiarities of the vestibule malignancies, such as the easy exposure and catheter placement, the absence of vital structures in proximity, and the clear reconstructive issues after ablative surgery, are shared by the other above‐defined midface malignancies, for which primary/exclusive IRT treatment may offer specific advantages as well …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The definite inclusion of such recommendation in the guidelines will anyway require further prospective studies in larger series. Furthermore, we feel that many of the peculiarities of the vestibule malignancies, such as the easy exposure and catheter placement, the absence of vital structures in proximity, and the clear reconstructive issues after ablative surgery, are shared by the other above‐defined midface malignancies, for which primary/exclusive IRT treatment may offer specific advantages as well …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plastic tubes were always placed at the end of surgical resection and before flap insetting when reconstruction was performed (group III, 13 patients; Figure E,F). Exclusive interstitial IRT for a midface malignancy (primary, 23; recurrent, 6) for which surgical reconstruction was not expected to be fully satisfactory. For midface malignancy, we intend lesions arising at the junction between mucosal and skin surfaces, and typically at the level of the lips, cheek, and nose vestibule (group IV, 29 patients; Figure G,H).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squamous cell carcinoma arising from the nasal vestibule is a rare condition accounting for about 1% of head and neck malignancies with several particularities concerning both staging and treatment [2]. It develops as a result of exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet radiation, toxic agents such as arsenic, scars caused by burns or injuries, chronic ulcer, extension of life expectancy, compromised immune status and genetic defects [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of different treatment modalities (surgery, radiotherapy) should be considered in cases of locally advanced lesions and, most of all, clinical and/or pathological evidence of neck metastasis [2]. Chemotherapy has a limited place [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, resection of skull base tumors is also often complicated by proximity or extension into critical structures resulting in suboptimal outcomes [13,14]. Cesium-131 (Cs-131) Brachytherapy (BRT) is an effective and highly conformal contemporary technique for administering further radiation in a previously irradiated field while limiting toxicity in the treatment of head and neck cancer [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%