2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01533-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy alone vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (aged >65 years)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the aged >65 years NPC patients received insufficient cycles and doses of CT due to the poor performance status [8]. Vivek et al indicate that compared with RT alone, CCRT provided favorable survival outcomes in aged ≥ 70 years NPC patients [10], while Mi et al showed that IMRT alone, compared to IMRT plus CT, provided less grade 3 side events and comparable survival with 3-year of OS (72.1% vs. 72.5%, P=0.735), PFS (65.9% vs. 70.1%, P=0.735), DMFS (76.4% vs. 71.6%, P=0.735) and LRRFS (90.8% vs. 98.0%, P=0.735) [11]. Furthermore, the unfavorable factors including poor performance status, comorbidities, reduced organ function and decreased social support affected the tolerance of CCRT in the older patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the aged >65 years NPC patients received insufficient cycles and doses of CT due to the poor performance status [8]. Vivek et al indicate that compared with RT alone, CCRT provided favorable survival outcomes in aged ≥ 70 years NPC patients [10], while Mi et al showed that IMRT alone, compared to IMRT plus CT, provided less grade 3 side events and comparable survival with 3-year of OS (72.1% vs. 72.5%, P=0.735), PFS (65.9% vs. 70.1%, P=0.735), DMFS (76.4% vs. 71.6%, P=0.735) and LRRFS (90.8% vs. 98.0%, P=0.735) [11]. Furthermore, the unfavorable factors including poor performance status, comorbidities, reduced organ function and decreased social support affected the tolerance of CCRT in the older patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, an investigational study conducted by Vivek et al indicated that CCRT, compared to RT alone, provided better survival outcomes in aged ≥ 70 years NPC patients 10 . While a pair-matched study performed by Mi et al showed that compared with intensity-modulate radiotherapy (IMRT) alone, adding CT to IMRT provided comparable survival and more grade 3 toxicities 11 . Given these situations, most oncologists usually recommended RT alone for treating older NPC patients 12 , 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30][31] Moreover, NPC patients aged >65 years old have often received insufficient cycles and doses of CT due to their poor performance status. [10] Verma et al indicated that CCRT provided more favorable survival outcomes in NPC patients aged ≥70 years old compared with RT alone, [12] while Mi et al showed that IMRT alone provided less grade 3 side events and comparable 3-year of OS (72.1% vs 72.5%, P = .735), PFS (65.9% vs 70.1%, P = .735), distant metastasis-free survival (76.4% vs 71.6%, P = .735), and loco-regional recurrence-free survival (90.8% vs 98.0%, P = .735) compared to IMRT combined with CT. [13] Furthermore, factors including poor performance status, comorbidities, reduced organ function, and decreased social support affected the tolerance of CCRT in older patients. A higher number of grade 3 and 4 CT-related side events was correlated with cancer patients with comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an investigational study conducted by Verma et al indicated that CCRT, compared to RT alone, provided better survival outcomes in NPC patients aged ≥70 years [12] . In contrast, another study performed by Mi et al showed that compared with intensity-modulate radiotherapy (IMRT) alone, combining CT with IMRT provided a similar survival and higher grade 3 toxicities [13] . Given this evidence, most oncologists usually recommend RT alone for treating elderly NPC patients [14,15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation