2005
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-3636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Of Institutional Arrangements For River Basin Management In Eight Basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Australian government plays a major role in water policy development and financing. The institutional arrangements in the MDB have evolved through three major stages (Blomquist et al 2004):…”
Section: Policy and Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian government plays a major role in water policy development and financing. The institutional arrangements in the MDB have evolved through three major stages (Blomquist et al 2004):…”
Section: Policy and Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of scholars have successfully applied CPR theory to understand water allocation and infrastructure provision in larger river basins (Blomquist et al 2004(Blomquist et al , 2005Kerr 2007;Schlager and Blomquist 2008;Heikkila et al 2011;Schlager and Heikkila 2011;Heikkila and Schlager 2012;Yetim 2002). For example, CPR theory is applied to US interstate river compacts by Schlager and Blomquist (2008) and Heikkila and Schlager (2012) focus on cross-scale institutional linkages to assess the performance and climate change adaptability of US interstate river compacts, respectively; Yetim (2002) emphasizes the importance of clear property rights and enforcement mechanisms to solve International Common Pool Resources disputes; Blomquist et al (2005) and Kerr (2007) identified a number of factors of CPR theory related with successful river basin management, including, among others, leadership, the recognition of sub-basin authorities and nesting of organizational capacities and collective choice across scales.…”
Section: Cpr Theory Large Scale Contexts and Pollution Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CPR theory is applied to US interstate river compacts by Schlager and Blomquist (2008) and Heikkila and Schlager (2012) focus on cross-scale institutional linkages to assess the performance and climate change adaptability of US interstate river compacts, respectively; Yetim (2002) emphasizes the importance of clear property rights and enforcement mechanisms to solve International Common Pool Resources disputes; Blomquist et al (2005) and Kerr (2007) identified a number of factors of CPR theory related with successful river basin management, including, among others, leadership, the recognition of sub-basin authorities and nesting of organizational capacities and collective choice across scales. As illustrated by those works, using CPR theory in large scale contexts entails a redefinition of concepts like user group and governance system, as well as the consideration of phenomena other than collective action problems (for example the existence of contentious politics).…”
Section: Cpr Theory Large Scale Contexts and Pollution Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bardhan (2000), examining the factors affecting irrigation maintenance in South India, finds that inequality has a negative effect. Likewise, Blomquist et al (2005) emphasize that extreme asymmetries in resource endowments among actors can imperil the success of decentralization efforts. In line with the discussion on the degree to which heterogeneity favours or hinders collective action, we must further distinguish carefully between elite domination and elite capture.…”
Section: Elite Capture In Natural Resource Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%