1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9236(99)70073-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of inhibitory effects of meloxicam and diclofenac on human thromboxane biosynthesis after single doses and at steady state

Abstract: These data show that meloxicam inhibits TXB2 generation at clinically relevant doses, although less potently than diclofenac. Thus our data suggest that the COX-2 preference of meloxicam observed in vitro may not result in clinical advantages when the higher dose of 15 mg is needed. Because of the increase in EC50 at steady state, COX-1 is relatively spared when the lower dose of 7.5 mg is administered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 As a matter of the fact, such a dramatic loss in COX inhibitory potency and a drop in selectivity under the HWB assay conditions are common to other selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as valdecoxib, 31,32 etoricoxib, 31,32 lumiracoxib, 33 and rofecoxib, 34,35 as well as tNSAIDs such as nimesulide 16,31 and meloxicam. 36,37 It should be pointed out that, according to the test, 10a, 10c, and 11c exhibited an affinity for COX-2 5-10-fold higher than that for COX-1, which should translate clinically into an acceptable GI safety, and allowing for a sufficient prostacyclin generation that should mitigate the CV effects showed by overly selective COX-2 inhibitors, as previously discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…10 As a matter of the fact, such a dramatic loss in COX inhibitory potency and a drop in selectivity under the HWB assay conditions are common to other selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as valdecoxib, 31,32 etoricoxib, 31,32 lumiracoxib, 33 and rofecoxib, 34,35 as well as tNSAIDs such as nimesulide 16,31 and meloxicam. 36,37 It should be pointed out that, according to the test, 10a, 10c, and 11c exhibited an affinity for COX-2 5-10-fold higher than that for COX-1, which should translate clinically into an acceptable GI safety, and allowing for a sufficient prostacyclin generation that should mitigate the CV effects showed by overly selective COX-2 inhibitors, as previously discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It should be noted that diclofenac and lumiracoxib have a relatively low risk of gastrointestinal complications (Henry et al, 1996). This reduced risk with diclofenac and lumiracoxib was associated with the preferential or complete inhibition of COX-2 at therapeutic doses, respectively (Tegeder et al, 1999;Brune, 2007). It remains to be further investigated whether the low Fig.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Meloxicam was also more potent in reducing edema of the inflamed rat paw than indomethacin, piroxicam, diclofenac, or naproxen (Engelhardt et al, 1995;Engelhardt, 1996) and produced analgesia in rat and dog models of inflammatory pain (Cross et al, 1997;Laird et al, 1997;Santos et al, 1998). At therapeutic doses of 7.5 or 15 mg, meloxicam did not reduce platelet aggregation or prolong bleeding time ex vivo (Stichtenoth et al, 1997;De Meijer et al, 1999;Panara et al, 1999;Tegeder et al, 1999), although thromboxane formation by platelets was inhibited by 35% after 15 mg of meloxicam. This demonstrated the low inhibitory activity against COX-1 of meloxicam in vivo.…”
Section: A Treatment Of Inflammatory Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%