1986
DOI: 10.1080/07055900.1986.9649252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of infrared radiometrie, observed and sunshine‐derived cloud cover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the density of a cloud increases, the cloud becomes visibly opaque just before becoming opaque to infrared radiation. Harrison and Coombes (1986) showed that infrared estimates of cloud cover are closer to visual estimates of total opacity than to those of total amount; hence it should be assumed here that cloud cover C refers to total opacity rather than to total amount. (See Manual of Surface Weather Observations, (AES, 1977) for definitions of total opacity and total amount.)…”
Section: Data Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the density of a cloud increases, the cloud becomes visibly opaque just before becoming opaque to infrared radiation. Harrison and Coombes (1986) showed that infrared estimates of cloud cover are closer to visual estimates of total opacity than to those of total amount; hence it should be assumed here that cloud cover C refers to total opacity rather than to total amount. (See Manual of Surface Weather Observations, (AES, 1977) for definitions of total opacity and total amount.)…”
Section: Data Basementioning
confidence: 99%