1992
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199202000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Induction, Maintenance, and Recovery Characteristics of Sevoflurane-N2O and Propofol-Sevoflurane-N2O With Propofol-Isoflurane-N2O Anesthesia

Abstract: Induction of, maintenance of, and recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia were compared with propofol and isoflurane anesthesia when administered with nitrous oxide to patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Seventy-five healthy (ASA I or II), consenting patients were randomly assigned to receive either (I) propofol for induction of anesthesia and isoflurane-nitrous oxide for maintenance (control), (II) propofol for induction and sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for maintenance, or (III) sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was not sufficiently powerful to detect any significant increase in this variable. If during stage II, a 5-mm 2 .min 21 increase in activity is considered significant (from the activity level seen during preoxygenation), then using Altman's nomogram [11] (and SD 4.6), 30 volunteers would be needed for a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. At the end of stage II, plasma epinephrine levels were unchanged from baseline in both groups but plasma norepinephrine levels were increased significantly, the increase being the same in both groups (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was not sufficiently powerful to detect any significant increase in this variable. If during stage II, a 5-mm 2 .min 21 increase in activity is considered significant (from the activity level seen during preoxygenation), then using Altman's nomogram [11] (and SD 4.6), 30 volunteers would be needed for a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. At the end of stage II, plasma epinephrine levels were unchanged from baseline in both groups but plasma norepinephrine levels were increased significantly, the increase being the same in both groups (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard monitoring was used, including relaxometry and BIS (BIS XP, Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA). Five minutes before induction of anaesthesia, psychomotor and cognitive function were assessed using the Trieger Dot Test and Digit Symbol Substitution Test [9,10]. For the Trieger Dot Test, patients have to connect printed dots on a paper sheet within 1 min; missed dots and the distance line-dot (mm) are noted [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (25,27,28), and desflurane ([F-] = 0.9 AM) (30). The activation energies were calculated as described above and are shown in Table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%