2014 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icelmach.2014.6960534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in-wheel permanent magnet motors for electric traction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This substantially benefits the torque density. The outer-rotor PMSM's net mass may be up to 15% smaller than the corresponding one of a motor with inner rotor [7]. The outer rotor motors are the primary choice in electrified applications as they reduce transmission losses both during propulsion and regenerative braking.…”
Section: Inner and Outer Rotor Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This substantially benefits the torque density. The outer-rotor PMSM's net mass may be up to 15% smaller than the corresponding one of a motor with inner rotor [7]. The outer rotor motors are the primary choice in electrified applications as they reduce transmission losses both during propulsion and regenerative braking.…”
Section: Inner and Outer Rotor Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, this approach was mostly used for electrical machine design with two single responses. Several cases were presented where average torque was maximised (or maintained) while minimising torque ripple [8,21,22,26,58,75], cogging torque/force [9,14,34,48,85] or harmonic components in the machine [47,49,73,74]. Hwang et al applied this approach to maximise efficiency while minimising torque ripple [23,52] or cogging torque [24][25][26] while Zhu et al used the same approach for structural design [20].…”
Section: Multiple Single-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting simulated efficiency maps of the designs is the first step towards that goal, while embedding those maps in a vehicle model and simulating a realistic driving scheme is a more accurate way. [5,6,9]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%