1990
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(90)90065-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vitro hydrolysis, subcutaneous and intramedullary implantation to evaluate the strength retention of absorbable osteosynthesis implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, PDLLA and PLGA are believed to be absorbed completely in vitro in two to three and one to two years, respectively [30]. Furthermore, PDLLA and PLGA are known to degrade faster in vivo in vascularized cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue than in vitro [29]. Hasegawa et al [17] reported that a hydroxyapatite/PDLLA composite was resorbed completely and cancellous bone formation plateaued at 26 weeks in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, PDLLA and PLGA are believed to be absorbed completely in vitro in two to three and one to two years, respectively [30]. Furthermore, PDLLA and PLGA are known to degrade faster in vivo in vascularized cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue than in vitro [29]. Hasegawa et al [17] reported that a hydroxyapatite/PDLLA composite was resorbed completely and cancellous bone formation plateaued at 26 weeks in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1,22 Previously, some investigators have observed enhanced strength loss of PLA in vivo compared to in vitro, probably due to enzymatic action. 23 Some have reported no differences between rates of degradation of PLDLA 96/4 in vivo and in vitro. 5 Other studies have shown that hydroxyl free radicals ( .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to do this, however, have not been successful due to rapid strength and modulus loss of the composite material following exposure to simulated body fluids. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] This behavior has been attributed to rapid fiber/polymer interfacial bond hydrolysis following exposure to an aqueous environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%