Comparison of in house polymerase chain reaction with conventional techniques for the detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosisDNA in granulomatous lymphadenopathy

Abstract

Aims-To evaluate the usefulness of the devR based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in lymph node aspirates and tissues of lymphadenitis and to compare PCR with conventional diagnostic techniques. Subjects and methods-Coded specimens of fine needle aspirates and biopsies from 22 patients with tuberculous lymphadenitis, 14 patients with non-tubercular lymphadenitis, and nine patients with granulomatous lymphadenitis were processed and subjected to analysis by PCR, smear microscopy, M tuberculosis culture, histology, and cytology. Results-Tuberculous lymphadenitis was correctly diagnosed by PCR in 18 patients, by culture in five patients, by histology in 13 patients, and by cytology in seven patients. PCR gave two false positive results in 14 patients with non-tubercular lymphadenitis. The sensitivity of the conventional techniques was significantly higher with biopsies (17 of 22 specimens; 77%) than with fine needle aspirates (nine of 22 specimens; 41%). However, the sensitivity of PCR was not significantly higher with biopsies (68%) in comparison with fine needle aspirates (55%). The sensitivity of either biopsy PCR or fine needle aspirate PCR was not significantly diVerent from that of either histology combined with culture or cytology combined with culture. The overall combined specificity of PCR was 86%. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA was detected in six of nine patients with granulomatous lymphadenitis. Conclusion-PCR is the most sensitive single technique available to date for the demonstration of M tuberculosis in specimens derived from patients with a clinical suspicion of tuberculous lymphadenitis. The value of PCR lies in its use as an adjunct test in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis, particularly in those patients where conventional methods fail. Because fine needle aspiration is not an invasive procedure, it is the procedure of choice, and PCR should be performed initially on these samples. Excisional biopsy histology and PCR should be recommended only for patients in whom fine needle aspirate PCR is negative or when there is discrepancy with the clinical impression. (J Clin Pathol 2000;53:355-361)

Children with significant cervical lymphadenopathy: clinicopathological analysis and role of fine-needle aspiration in Indian setup

“…Pode-se, portanto, concluir que a CAAF é uma ferramenta diagnóstica confiável para auxiliar a evitar procedimentos [25][26][27] .…”

The role of polymerase chain reaction in the management of osteoarticular tuberculosis

“…The overall sensitivity of PCR was 70.83% in this study. Various studies have reported sensitivity ranging from 61% to 83% [15,18,20,21]. The low sensitivity can be explained due to the dilution of tubercle bacilli in non-spinal samples, such as synovial fluid and synovial tissues.…”

Use of the hupB Gene Encoding a Histone-Like Protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a Target for Detection and Differentiation of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis

“…Novel targets have been exploited for diagnostic purposes by using PCR, namely, the devR response regulator gene (42,43), rRNA (5), selected chromosomal fragments (3,18,25,29), genes coding for the 65-kDa heat shock protein (36), the 38-kDa protein antigen (44), the dnaJ gene (47), and insertion sequences such as IS6110, IS990, and IS1081 (1,15,16,23); these are all examples of diverse targets that have been considered for PCR-based diagnostic approaches. Easy-to-use PCR kits targeting the rRNA gene for detection of M. tuberculosis are commercially available (Amplicor; Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.; GenProbe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) (3,51,54), but it involves an additional step of DNA hybridization (3,14).…”