IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2019
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2019.8899855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of In-Field Measurements and INSAR Estimates of Soil Moisture: Inversion Strategies of Interferometric Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, conducted in two different regions, they found that the behavior of the short-lived signal varies significantly in different land cover types, and the model proposed by [8], based on soil moisture variation, was not sufficient to explain the observed phase inconsistencies. The same result was also obtained by [26]. Therefore, they propose an alternative model for soil moisture variation that considers the effect of vegetation biomass growth [25].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In their study, conducted in two different regions, they found that the behavior of the short-lived signal varies significantly in different land cover types, and the model proposed by [8], based on soil moisture variation, was not sufficient to explain the observed phase inconsistencies. The same result was also obtained by [26]. Therefore, they propose an alternative model for soil moisture variation that considers the effect of vegetation biomass growth [25].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Previous semi-empirical studies have considered single polarization to build a relationship between soil moisture and a backscatter model at 10 cm depth [9] and estimated ϑ v with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3-6% [10][11][12] using C-band data. There have also been studies that have used the SAR interferometry technique and Sentinel-1 data to estimate soil moisture and compare them with in situ measurements [13]. Even though SAR interferometry is less frequently used in the remote sensing community to estimate soil moisture, its advantage lies in its ability to disentangle moisture and terrain roughness contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though SAR interferometry is less frequently used in the remote sensing community to estimate soil moisture, its advantage lies in its ability to disentangle moisture and terrain roughness contributions. Most SAR-based soil moisture estimation studies have covered small areas limited to a few hundred square kilometers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Estimating soil moisture over a wider area and at a higher resolution using SAR imagery will provide information on managing water resources and irrigation scheduling that can benefit a large number of farmers [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%