2009
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a1675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al reported similar results (18% reduction) comparing ATCM with FTC technique in different patients for each technique. They did not correlate the image quality and radiation exposure with patient weight or cross-sectional dimensions (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al reported similar results (18% reduction) comparing ATCM with FTC technique in different patients for each technique. They did not correlate the image quality and radiation exposure with patient weight or cross-sectional dimensions (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are no definite data on the radiation exposure of the whole aortogram by CT angiography, the dose seems to have little effect on the human body as long as examinations are not repeatedly performed. 10) In addition, it is still unclear whether intravenous contrast administration is safe enough to warrant widespread use, especially in the effect on renal function. Previous studies focusing on imaging with contrast medium demonstrated much lower incidence of renal failure due to contrast medium-induced nephropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 There have been several studies that showed variable and sometimes significant levels of dose reduction with use of ATCM, depending on body region and patient size. [16][17][18] It is important to be familiar with the different parameters of the ATCM technique to achieve appropriate image quality for each specific diagnostic task, to not generate images with lower noise than necessary. An appropriate minimum and maximum milliampere value with a designated noise index or SD (depending on the manufacturer) based on the observer preference is prudent to prevent an inappropriate increase in the image noise related to lower photon fluence.…”
Section: Current Strategies In Dose Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%