2008
DOI: 10.1080/07357900701788098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ICE (Ifosfamide-Carboplatin-Etoposide) Versus DHAP (Cytosine Arabinoside-Cisplatin-Dexamethasone) as Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma

Abstract: Although the toxicity profiles of both ICE and DHAP regimens were similar in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory HD or NHL, ICE seems to have higher rates of response than DHAP regimen does.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ICE seems to have higher rates of response than DHAP regimen as in DHAP group 11 (22.5%) achieved CR and 17 (35%) achieved PR, leading to an overall response rate (ORR: CR + PR) of 57.5%. In the evaluable ICE group (n = 22) rates of CR, PR, and ORR were 27%, 41% and 68% and in the DHAP group (n = 27) rates of CR, PR, and ORR were 18%, 30% and 48% (P = 0.24, for ORR) 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICE seems to have higher rates of response than DHAP regimen as in DHAP group 11 (22.5%) achieved CR and 17 (35%) achieved PR, leading to an overall response rate (ORR: CR + PR) of 57.5%. In the evaluable ICE group (n = 22) rates of CR, PR, and ORR were 27%, 41% and 68% and in the DHAP group (n = 27) rates of CR, PR, and ORR were 18%, 30% and 48% (P = 0.24, for ORR) 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В качестве предтрансплантационной индукци-онной подготовки большинство авторов рекомендуют схемы DHAP, IGEV, ICE, ASHAP, ESHAP, GDP, Dexa-BEAM, mini-BEAM и др., обладающие сопоставимой эффек-тивностью [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…В качестве предтрансплантационной подготов-ки большинство авторов рекомендуют схемы DHAP, IGEV, ICE, ASHAP, ESHAP, GDP, DexaBEAM, miniBEAM и др., обладающие сопоставимой эффек-тивностью [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified