2006
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of P-RnaPredict and mfold—algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction

Abstract: P-RnaPredict is available for non-commercial usage. Interested parties should contact Kay C. Wiese (wiese@cs.sfu.ca).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though such experimental structural information currently exists for only a small number of cases, such information may soon be available. Alternatively, using existing thermodynamic-based secondary structure prediction programs (14, 27) (with ϳ50%-90% prediction accuracy [28]) for predicting a small set of thermodynamically stable folds and restricting the algorithm to those, allows both reduction of the search space and integration of thermodynamic considerations into our model, which are not fully embedded into standard covariance model applications. Certainly, other structure prediction tools, such as those based on probabilistic models (29), can also be used to derive a set of highly probable folds as an input to our method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though such experimental structural information currently exists for only a small number of cases, such information may soon be available. Alternatively, using existing thermodynamic-based secondary structure prediction programs (14, 27) (with ϳ50%-90% prediction accuracy [28]) for predicting a small set of thermodynamically stable folds and restricting the algorithm to those, allows both reduction of the search space and integration of thermodynamic considerations into our model, which are not fully embedded into standard covariance model applications. Certainly, other structure prediction tools, such as those based on probabilistic models (29), can also be used to derive a set of highly probable folds as an input to our method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this effort is focused on providing a means whereby the shape of these biomolecules can be predicted through the use of computer algorithms. Dynamic Programming [14] and Genetic Algorithms [11,13], take a sequence of bases and attempt to find a secondary structure using free energy minimization as a guide. Comparative methods, on the other hand, use known sequence and folding patterns to generate a predicted secondary structure [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary computation was previously used for RNA structure folding [2], [8], [18], [19], [38], [39], [40], [44] and the prediction of common structures [3] using free energy calculations. Furthermore, evolutionary algorithms were applied to the identification of conserved regulatory RNA structures in prokaryotic metabolic pathway genes [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%