2009
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison ofIn VitroVirulence Factors ofCampylobacter jejunitoIn VivoLesion Production

Abstract: Campylobacter jejuni is recognized as one of the most common agents of food-borne bacterial gastroenteritis in humans. Previous work has shown that C. jejuni isolates vary in their ability to invade and survive in laboratory grown cells. The correlation of these assays to actual lesion development in the hosts has not been determined. Therefore, this study aims to define the relationship between in vitro and in vivo assays for determining the virulence of C. jejuni isolates. Fifty-nine C. jejuni poultry isolat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased ability of mouse-adapted C. jejuni to adhere and invade in cultured cells was unexpected since the ability to interact with gastrointestinal tract epithelial cells in vivo must be important for C. jejuni host colonization [46]. However, discordance between in vitro adherence and invasion results and in vivo virulence measures has been described before [47]. Also, screens using epithelial cell culture models have been unable to discover significant invasion factors, outside of genes affecting motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreased ability of mouse-adapted C. jejuni to adhere and invade in cultured cells was unexpected since the ability to interact with gastrointestinal tract epithelial cells in vivo must be important for C. jejuni host colonization [46]. However, discordance between in vitro adherence and invasion results and in vivo virulence measures has been described before [47]. Also, screens using epithelial cell culture models have been unable to discover significant invasion factors, outside of genes affecting motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few animal models have been developed for the study of Campylobacter pathology and virulence determinants [20][21][22][23]. Possible factors that aid in adhesion, invasion, and clinical disease include (1) resistance of the bacterial capsule to host-innate immunity, which may play a role in immune evasion; (2) flagellar proteins, which are utilized as a secretory apparatus necessary for invasion and adherence; (3) presence of a DNAse, cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) that causes apoptosis, although some data suggest that colitis can be produced by strains lacking CDT; and (4) capability of infective strains for N-and O-glycosylation, which may also contribute to immune evasion [24][25][26].…”
Section: Acute Campylobacteriosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major contributing factor to our poor understanding of campylobacteriosis is the lack of robust experimental models mimicking the various phases of acute human infection. Although some mammals including monkey, 8 ferret 9 and piglet 10 have provided valuable information regarding cellular events associated with campylobacteriosis, limited reagents and lack of genetic manipulation in these models have constrained the generation of deep mechanistic understanding. We recently established an acute model of campylobacteriosis using germ-free Il10 −/− mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%