2020
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00406.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hemodynamics, cardiac electrophysiology, and ventricular arrhythmia in an open- and a closed-chest porcine model of acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an important contributor to sudden cardiac death. Large animal models are widely used to study AMI-induced arrhythmia, but the mode of AMI induction ranges from thoracotomy and surgical ligation of a coronary vessel (open chest) to minimally invasive techniques, including balloon occlusion (closed chest). How the choice of induction affects arrhythmia development is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare an open-chest and a closed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our in vivo model with farm pigs, baseline EMW was -20 ± 19 ms during spontaneous heart rate and -25 ± 26 ms at heart rate 100 bpm. As known from the literature, an open chest model leads to a prolonged QT interval which may contribute to the negativity [32]. Our ndings at baseline may re ect the empirical knowledge that farm pigs are susceptible to arrhythmias during anaesthesia and cardiac manipulation [33].…”
Section: The Shift In Electromechanical Windowsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our in vivo model with farm pigs, baseline EMW was -20 ± 19 ms during spontaneous heart rate and -25 ± 26 ms at heart rate 100 bpm. As known from the literature, an open chest model leads to a prolonged QT interval which may contribute to the negativity [32]. Our ndings at baseline may re ect the empirical knowledge that farm pigs are susceptible to arrhythmias during anaesthesia and cardiac manipulation [33].…”
Section: The Shift In Electromechanical Windowsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The open chest model may have altered the preload and afterload conditions [32]. However, we analysed the absolute change in the parameters during the intervention in a controlled manner with no surgical or physiological modi cation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our in vivo model, baseline EMW was slightly negative at both heart rates. The normal value for EMW in land race pigs during normothermia is unknown, but an open chest model can lead to a prolonged QT interval which may contribute to EMW negativity [21]. In an ex vivo model, isolated Langendorff-perfused Göttingen minipig hearts baseline EMW was 134 ms [22].…”
Section: The Shift In Electromechanical Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used to identify electrical intervals were identical for all measurements and the reproducibility of the measurements was good. The open chest model may have altered the preload and afterload conditions [21]. However, we analysed the absolute change in the parameters during stable phases.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open chest model may have altered the preload and afterload conditions [21]. However, we analysed the absolute change in the parameters during stable phases.The pigs were anaesthetized with iso urane and morphine after induction with pentobarbital.…”
Section: Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%