2021
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11040253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Hemodynamic Visualization in Cerebral Arteries: Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Replace Computational Fluid Dynamics?

Abstract: A multimodality approach was applied using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI), time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) signal intensity gradient (SIG), and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the 3D blood flow characteristics and wall shear stress (WSS) of the cerebral arteries. TOF-MRA and 4D flow MRI were performed on the major cerebral arteries in 16 healthy volunteers (mean age 34.7 ± 7.6 years). The flow rate measured with 4D flow MRI in the intern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, similar to previous studies [21][22][23][24], our results of 4D flow MRI with ITK-SNAP analysis still tend to measure lower flow velocities than CFD in several subjects (Figure 3b). This is due to the deviation in the geometric angiographic reconstruction between the two methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, similar to previous studies [21][22][23][24], our results of 4D flow MRI with ITK-SNAP analysis still tend to measure lower flow velocities than CFD in several subjects (Figure 3b). This is due to the deviation in the geometric angiographic reconstruction between the two methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It has been argued that growth and rupture of an aneurysm are generated by a three-way relationship among the pathobiology of the wall, aneurysmal geometry, and intra-aneurysmal flow [3,4]. To quantify the hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), also termed four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have been conducted and compared [5,6,7]. However, these approaches cannot adequately quantify hemodynamic features because the spatiotemporal resolution of 4D flow MRI is limited and it is difficult to set patient-specific boundary conditions for CFD [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, 4D flow MRI [7], one of the most advanced imaging techniques, allows the detection of a time-dependent blood flow field [8], the estimate of haemodynamics parameters as flow stasis, mean velocity [9], and particle tracking [10]. However, the resolution provided by 4D flow MRI might be not enough to accurately catch the complexity of cardiac flows and their transitional effects: formation of shear layers, small vortices, and their interactions [11,12,13,14,15]. For this reason, in-silico simulations of the heart, often combined with medical images, stand as a valuable tool for a more accurate descripition of blood flows and to estimate a number of haemodynamic indicators as the wall shear stress (WSS) [16,17,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%