1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1995.tb02341.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Hemodialysis versus Hemoperfusion in the Clearance of High‐Dose Methotrexate in Pigs

Abstract: To evaluate the different capabilities of hemo-perfusion (HP) and hemodialysis (HD) treatment in resolving the side effects during high-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy, an experimental comparative study was done. Under general anesthesia, 12 female Large-White pigs, 35 +/- 5 kg body weight, underwent a bilateral renal vessel ligature to create an acute renal failure and avoid the physiologic elimination of MTX. An MTX i.v. infusion was performed using a dose of 12.5 g/m2 and for a specific time according to it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under physiological conditions, MTX is also negatively charged and hydrophilic [3] and this may explain why MTX is also highly eectively adsorbed on the BR-350 column. Moreover, our observation is con®rmed by recent data obtained from pigs demonstrating that haemoperfusion over anionic resins is the most eective method of extracorporeal MTX removal [9]. Therefore, the combined use of PRP and HDF, as well as of PRP alone are eective methods for extracorporeal treatment of MTX toxicity, avoiding the disadvantages of other treatment regimes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Under physiological conditions, MTX is also negatively charged and hydrophilic [3] and this may explain why MTX is also highly eectively adsorbed on the BR-350 column. Moreover, our observation is con®rmed by recent data obtained from pigs demonstrating that haemoperfusion over anionic resins is the most eective method of extracorporeal MTX removal [9]. Therefore, the combined use of PRP and HDF, as well as of PRP alone are eective methods for extracorporeal treatment of MTX toxicity, avoiding the disadvantages of other treatment regimes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In our experience, HD was superior to HD with charcoal hemoperfusion [18]. In a porcine model, hemoperfusion over an exchange resin slightly outperformed HD via a Fresenius F6 (not high-flux) membrane [19]. Wall et al [11] prospectively administered MTX in patients with chronic dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency and achieved adequate clearance using high-flux HD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A total of 1376 articles were identified after removal of duplicates. In the final analysis, 92 articles were included, including two in vitro experiments (174,175), four animal experiments (176 179), 84 case reports and case series (24,35,88,90,126,163,170,171,180 –255), one pharmacokinetic modeling study (256), and one observational study (160). Although several articles were designed as pharmacokinetic studies in kidney failure patients (170,190,204,225,242), many participants in these studies developed methotrexate-associated toxicity and were included in case reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%