2012
DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2010.516253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Hargreaves and FAO56 equations for estimating monthly evapotranspiration for semi-arid and arid environments

Abstract: The objectives of this study are to compare reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) computed using different forms of the Hargreaves (HG) equation with the standard FAO56PM; and to compare ET 0 computed using the FAO56PM with limited data with the standard FAO56PM complete data set method. For this purpose, climatic data from 12 weather stations covering an area of *90 km 2 of predominantly arid and semi-arid conditions are used. Ratios of ET 0 estimated using the updated HG equation were closer to 1 when compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation is accepted by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Task Committee on standardisation of ET 0 , the International Irrigation and Drainage Committee and the food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the suitability of this equation are confirmed for different climates (Ravelli and Rota 1999;Irmak et al 2003a;Garcia et al 2004Garcia et al , 2007aZhao et al 2005;Temesgen et al 2005a;Allen et al 2005Allen et al , 2006Ge et al 2006;Lopez-Urrea et al 2006a, b;Jabloun and Sahli 2008;Gundekar et al 2008;Trajkovic and Kolakovic 2009a, b;Mohawesh and Talozi 2011;Ghamarnia et al 2012;Ravazzani et al 2012;Heydari 2014a, 2014b). The FAO-56 PM method for predicting ET 0 applied on 24-h calculation time steps has the form (Allen et al 1998) …”
Section: Pm Equationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This equation is accepted by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Task Committee on standardisation of ET 0 , the International Irrigation and Drainage Committee and the food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the suitability of this equation are confirmed for different climates (Ravelli and Rota 1999;Irmak et al 2003a;Garcia et al 2004Garcia et al , 2007aZhao et al 2005;Temesgen et al 2005a;Allen et al 2005Allen et al , 2006Ge et al 2006;Lopez-Urrea et al 2006a, b;Jabloun and Sahli 2008;Gundekar et al 2008;Trajkovic and Kolakovic 2009a, b;Mohawesh and Talozi 2011;Ghamarnia et al 2012;Ravazzani et al 2012;Heydari 2014a, 2014b). The FAO-56 PM method for predicting ET 0 applied on 24-h calculation time steps has the form (Allen et al 1998) …”
Section: Pm Equationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Tabari and Talaee [26] used three Hargreaves-based equations to estimate ETo in Iran (with Köppen-Geiger climates BWh, BWk, BSk, Dsa, and Dsb) and compared the results with PM ETo estimations, leading to root mean square error (RMSE) varying from 0.49 to 1.60 mm day −1 . A similar study in Jordan was performed by Mohawesh and Talozi [15] where the accuracy of the original Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and the modified Hargreaves-Samani (MHS) equations, as proposed by Droogers and Allen [21], were compared with PM in a Köppen-Geiger BWh BSh climates. Results showed a RMSE ranging from 0.614 to 1.303 mm day −1 for HS and varying from 0.557 to 2.033 mm day −1 for the ModHS methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are several methods for estimating ETo, being the FAO-56 application of the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation [4] widely regarded as the most accurate. The method provides consistent ETo values in many regions and climates [10,11] and it has long been accepted worldwide as a good ETo estimator when compared with other methods [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The PM equation presents certain advantages when compared with other ETo estimation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The climate is subtropical and is characterized by a hot, dry summer season (April to October) and a warm winter season (November to March). Rainfall is less than 80 mm/year occurring mainly in two or three main events during the winter season [9,10]. The soil is characterized by low fertility, organic matter (1.01 to 4.71%), and CEC (49 cmol kg −1 ) [11,12].…”
Section: Field Site and Experiments Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%