2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Hand-Sewn versus Coupled Venous Anastomoses in Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction

Abstract: Complication and flap failure rates were similar between reconstructions performed with a venous coupler and those performed with hand-sewn venous anastomoses. These findings suggest that use of the venous anastomotic coupler is safe and effective in lower extremity reconstruction, with comparable outcomes to conventional sutured anastomoses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anastomotic couplers offer a superior alternative to hand-sewn methods, particularly, in cases of the anastomosis with a vein. Stanix et al 22 reported that the rates of complications and flap failure were similar between reconstructions performed using a venous coupler and those performed using hand-sewn venous anastomosis in lower extremity reconstructions, which have the highest reported rates of complications and flap failure among all anatomical regions. Conversely, in a systematic review of venous anastomotic couplers by Wu et al, 23 unique complications, such as coupler extrusion and palpability, were reported in cases with previous radiation exposure or thin, soft tissues (eg, head and neck, hands, and feet).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anastomotic couplers offer a superior alternative to hand-sewn methods, particularly, in cases of the anastomosis with a vein. Stanix et al 22 reported that the rates of complications and flap failure were similar between reconstructions performed using a venous coupler and those performed using hand-sewn venous anastomosis in lower extremity reconstructions, which have the highest reported rates of complications and flap failure among all anatomical regions. Conversely, in a systematic review of venous anastomotic couplers by Wu et al, 23 unique complications, such as coupler extrusion and palpability, were reported in cases with previous radiation exposure or thin, soft tissues (eg, head and neck, hands, and feet).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a trend toward a lower rate of venous thrombosis when a venous coupler was used, as compared to a hand-sewn anastomosis. Venous coupler systems have become common practice in free flap transfer throughout the body and have shown favorable outcomes compared to handsewn venous anastomoses in terms of venous thrombosis rate, revision rate, and flap loss/failure [18][19][20][21][22] . Coupler size has been shown to be important in some flap transfer settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venous coupler systems have become common practice in free flap transfer throughout the body and have shown favorable outcomes compared with hand-sewn venous anastomoses in terms of venous thrombosis rate, revision rate, and flap loss/failure. [19][20][21][22][23] Coupler size has been shown to be important in some flap transfer settings. In a review of 418 patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction using a venous coupler, multivariate analysis demonstrated a 41% reduction in revision rate for each increase in coupler size by 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a coupling device has become common practice and increased the efficiency of free flap reconstruction without affecting flap outcomes. 32…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%