2020
DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2020.1766564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of growth and nutritional status of Chinese and Japanese children and adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, regarding weight, it may be difficult to understand the appropriate weight for actual age in adolescents, who have rapid physical and mental developmental trajectories. To examine this issue, we calculated the average 50th BMI percentile of participants by sex and age (Table 1 ) and confirmed that it was comparable to the corresponding average BMI values of Japanese children (7–18 years, n = 4587) (Yin et al., 2020 ). Therefore, it is unlikely that there is a bias in the subjective assessment of BMI in this study, but it would be preferable to obtain data by actual measurement in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For example, regarding weight, it may be difficult to understand the appropriate weight for actual age in adolescents, who have rapid physical and mental developmental trajectories. To examine this issue, we calculated the average 50th BMI percentile of participants by sex and age (Table 1 ) and confirmed that it was comparable to the corresponding average BMI values of Japanese children (7–18 years, n = 4587) (Yin et al., 2020 ). Therefore, it is unlikely that there is a bias in the subjective assessment of BMI in this study, but it would be preferable to obtain data by actual measurement in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In China, urban/rural status was considered when choosing schools because of the wide gap in economic development between urban and rural areas, whereas this factor was not taken into account in Japan. The detailed sampling methods are reported elsewhere [16,21]. Individual participants without psychiatric or physical disorders were recruited from the selected schools using stratified random cluster sampling.…”
Section: Participants and Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height (m 2 ). All test procedures for the seven physical fitness items were conducted using the same types of instruments suggested by the new physical fitness test guidelines developed by the Japanese Sports Bureau of the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology in 2008 [20,21].…”
Section: Procedures and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%