2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ground sections, paraffin sections and micro-CT imaging of bone from the epiphysis of the porcine femur for morphometric evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be attributed to the ability of micro-CT scans to evaluate bone volume in a three-dimensional mode compared with the two-dimensional histology as previously suggested. 29 On the other hand, the effect of anticatabolic versus anabolic drugs on bone defect healing was subevaluated. We found that the use of anabolic drugs results in an increased BA% and BV% compared with anticatabolic drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This could be attributed to the ability of micro-CT scans to evaluate bone volume in a three-dimensional mode compared with the two-dimensional histology as previously suggested. 29 On the other hand, the effect of anticatabolic versus anabolic drugs on bone defect healing was subevaluated. We found that the use of anabolic drugs results in an increased BA% and BV% compared with anticatabolic drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,43 For radiographical (micro-CT scan) assessment as an outcome parameter, it needs to be emphasized that such an examination does not correlate well with the histological evaluation of a bone defect grafted with radiopaque bioceramics. 29 Thus, a radiographical scan has limited importance in the investigation of bone regeneration related to bone grafts, because it has low accuracy in discriminating newly formed bone from bioceramics material with the bone defect. Therefore, it can be concluded that the radiographic analysis of bone grafting procedures requires histological confirmation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The samples were sawed down to a size that fitted the fixation vials, and were subsequently fixed for 48 h in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 °C. After rinsing in PBS, the samples were scanned and evaluated by micro-CT (see 2.6), as in our previous studies 62 , 63 . After imaging, the samples were decalcified with a hydrochloric acid solution (Histolab Products, Sweden) and the screws were carefully removed after slicing the decalcified bone in half with a scalpel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were processed into ground sections as described previously [ 45 , 46 ] for the purpose of the histological analysis. Briefly, the samples were fixed with a 10% formaldehyde solution (7 days), immersed in 70% ethanol and then micro-CT scanned (see the next paragraph).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%