The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Ground and Laser Machined Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) Tools in Cutting Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics (CFRP) for Aircraft Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown by Mathew et al [143], core drilling tools achieve much smaller thrust force and torque, and better hole quality compared to commercial twist drills. Modification of the cutting edge geometry through rounding and chamfering significantly enhances the tool life and workpiece finish quality for carbide tools [35,58].…”
Section: Materials For Aeroframes-compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Mathew et al [143], core drilling tools achieve much smaller thrust force and torque, and better hole quality compared to commercial twist drills. Modification of the cutting edge geometry through rounding and chamfering significantly enhances the tool life and workpiece finish quality for carbide tools [35,58].…”
Section: Materials For Aeroframes-compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faraz et al [5] quantified drill wear using cutting edge radius as the measured parameter and found that it correlated well with forces, damage, etc. Dold et al [6] measured changes in the cutting edge radius of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) turning inserts to study whether laser machining of PCD inserts is a feasible technique for preparation of cutting edges. They found that the wear rate depended on the fiber angle, with the largest wear rate observed at 90 • FOA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…chip breakers, reduced cycle times and does not wear or incur forces on the cutting tool during processing. Dold et al [1,2] and Rabiey et al [3] demonstrated that laser processing also delivers a tool which exhibits equivalent, if not better performance results compared with conventional grinding processes. In general, diamond cutting tools can be characterised topographically by measuring the surface roughness of the cutting faces, geometrically by measuring the cutting edge radius as well as edge and face angles, and structurally by detecting material transformations, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%