2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of gridded multi-mission and along-track mono-mission satellite altimetry wave heights with in situ near-shore buoy data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is happened because of several reasons, previous study explained if the grid point is located away from the coastal buoy, the land influence will affect the grid averaging. Indeed, the closer the satellite tracks to the buoy, the smaller the estimate of the bias between altimeter and the buoy (Shanas et al, 2014). Buoy that located at Sarawak sea is far more away from the land compare to the buoy located at Sabah sea as shown in Figure 7 From the result of the satellite track presented in Figure. 7(a) and (b), has conclude the wind speed correlation and RMSE value for point located at Sarawak Sea should be better compared to the result from point at Sabah Sea.…”
Section: Data Verificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is happened because of several reasons, previous study explained if the grid point is located away from the coastal buoy, the land influence will affect the grid averaging. Indeed, the closer the satellite tracks to the buoy, the smaller the estimate of the bias between altimeter and the buoy (Shanas et al, 2014). Buoy that located at Sarawak sea is far more away from the land compare to the buoy located at Sabah sea as shown in Figure 7 From the result of the satellite track presented in Figure. 7(a) and (b), has conclude the wind speed correlation and RMSE value for point located at Sarawak Sea should be better compared to the result from point at Sabah Sea.…”
Section: Data Verificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Data from the Cryosat, Jason-2, and Altika Saral missions are available for the relevant period and region of interest and are presented in Figure 7b. Only the altimeter data in the offshore areas (further than 50 km from the coast) were taken into account, as comparisons with coastal buoy measurements indicated biases and errors in the altimeter measurements (Shanas et al, 2014), especially because of the large antenna footprint. The three altimeters' bands cover an area localized around the TC (more than 100 km from the TC center; Figure 7b), which allows an evaluation of the deep water external region of the TC.…”
Section: Figures 5bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The height scale of the coastal topography has a significant impact on the coastal measurement perturbation. Indeed, cComparisons with coastal buoy measurements indicate dramatic biases and errors in the altimeter measurements, relative to the coastal ones (Shanas et al 2014), and this is mainly because in such comparisons, in order to be free from land contamination, altimeter data are necessarily limited to offshore areas (at least 50 km), where sea state conditions can be very different from the coastal ones. With SARAL one can expect improvements in wave height measurement at low sea state because of better height resolution, and in coastal areas because smaller footprint and better tracking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%