1975
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(75)90298-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Gil-Vernet and classic flank approaches to pyelo- and ureterolithotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower revived interest in pyelolithotomy by suggesting that it may be a safer and easier method for removing renal stones than nephrolithotomy in 1913 [25]. Another important advance in open renal stone surgery was intrasinusally extended pyelolithotomy , pioneered by Gil-Vernet in 1965 [27]. Fitzpatrick et al from England further suggested the combination of extended pyelolithotomy with multiple radial nephrotomies for the treatment of large, complex staghorn stones (1974) [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower revived interest in pyelolithotomy by suggesting that it may be a safer and easier method for removing renal stones than nephrolithotomy in 1913 [25]. Another important advance in open renal stone surgery was intrasinusally extended pyelolithotomy , pioneered by Gil-Vernet in 1965 [27]. Fitzpatrick et al from England further suggested the combination of extended pyelolithotomy with multiple radial nephrotomies for the treatment of large, complex staghorn stones (1974) [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%