Comparison of GGMs based on one year GOCE observations with the EGM08 and terrestrial data over the area of Sudan

Godah, Walyeldeen; Krynski, Jan

doi:10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.003

Cited by 19 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, absolute geoid height differences ∆N might be calculated with Eq. (3) (Kotsakis and Sideris 1999;Fotopoulos et al 2003;Huang and Véronneau 2004;Gikas et al 2013). …”

Section: Global Geopotential Models (Ggms) and Gnss/levellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many researchers have investigated the contribution of GGMs produced from CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE satellites in local and global geoid models for various areas of the earth (Amos and Featherstone 2003;Kiamehr and Sjöberg 2005;Rodriguez-Caderot et al 2006;Benahmed Dahoa et al 2006;Ustun and Demirel 2006;Erol et al 2009;Kotsakis and Katsambalos 2010;Yilmaz et al 2010;Janak and Pitonak 2011;Gikas et al 2013;Godah and Krynski 2013;Soycan 2014). Various methods and approaches have been suggested as a result of the above-mentioned research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Evaluation of Recent Global Geopotential Models for Strip Area Project in Turkey

Doğanalp

2016

Earth sci. res. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to present the evaluations based on comparisons of geoid heights that are computed from several global geopotential models (GGMs) and the GNSS/levelling data. In this application framework, differences between geoid heights obtained by GGMs and GNSS/levelling were computed. Then, the availability of geoid heights calculated by GGMs for engineering applications were investigated. The Konya-Polatli (Ankara) Express Train Project as a strip area project was chosen as the study area. The length of the project is approximately 210 km and consists of 110 benchmarks that belong to the Turkish National Triangulation Network. In this study a total of 69 GGMs were compared. In order to examine more detail, these models were classified as three groups based on CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE. Each group was evaluated separately and the results were obtained. According to results, the best five models were detected for geoid height differences (N GNSS/lev -N ggm ) in terms of standard deviation. These are EIGEN-6c4, EIGEN-GRACE01s, EGM2008, EIGEN-6c3stat and EIGEN-6c2, respectively. Also, geoid heights were obtained using different parametric models. These parametric models were used in order to minimize the impact of the terms of bias, tilt etc. Generally, three, four, five and seven parametric models are used for the least-squares adjustment of the geoid height differences in the literature. Therefore, in this study the geoid heights were calculated for such different parametric models. After the geoid height values were computed from the parametric models, the best global geopotential models in terms of standard deviation were obtained as EIGEN-6c2, EIGEN-6c3stat, EGM2008, EIGEN-6c4 and EIGEN-GRACE01s, respectively.El propósito de este estudio es presentar las evaluaciones comparativas de alturas geoidales que fueron computadas a partir de varios Modelos Geopotenciales Globales (GGM, del inglés Global Geopotential Models) y la nivelación de información del Sistema Global de Navegación por Satélite. Luego se investigó la disposición para aplicaciones de ingeniería de las alturas geoidales calculadas por los modelos GGM. Se seleccionó el proyecto del Tren Expreso Konya-Polatli (Ankara) como el área de estudio por ser un terreno lineal. La longitud del proyecto es de 210 kilómetros y consiste de 110 puntos de referencia que pertenecen a la Red de Triangulación Nacional de Turquía. En este estudio se compararon 69 modelos GGM. Para un mejor examen, estos modelos se clasificaron en tres grupos basados en CHAMP (CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload), GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) y GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer). Cada grupo se evaluó por separado. De acuerdo con los resultados, se detectaron los cinco modelos mejores para las diferencias de alturas geoidales (NGNSS/LEV-NGGM) en términos de desviación estándar. Estos son EIGEN-6c4, EIGENGRACE01s, EGM2008, EIGEN-6c3stat, y EIGEN-6c2. También se obtuvieron las alturas geoide a través de diferentes modelos paramétrico...

show abstract

“…Therefore, absolute geoid height differences ∆N might be calculated with Eq. (3) (Kotsakis and Sideris 1999;Fotopoulos et al 2003;Huang and Véronneau 2004;Gikas et al 2013). …”

Section: Global Geopotential Models (Ggms) and Gnss/levellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evaluation of Recent Global Geopotential Models for Strip Area Project in Turkey

Doğanalp

2016

Earth sci. res. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A local analysis of the quality of the GOCE data for Sudan has been done by Godah and Krynski (2015). In their study, global geopotential models based on approximately 12 months of GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry (SGG) data have been compared over the area of Sudan with EGM08 and terrestrial data.…”

Section: Goce Solid Earth Special Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the special issue on GOCE Earth science applications and models

Meijde

Pail

Bingham

2015

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…We have to mention here that several studies concerning the validation as well as the accuracy assessment of GOCE-based GGMs have been performed in different regions of the world by different research teams, e.g. [14] [15] [16] worldwide; [17] [18] in Germany; [19] in Central Europe: [20] in Poland; [21] in Norway; [22] in Brazil; [23] [24] in Sudan and [25] in Saudi Arabia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Accuracy Assessment of the Latest Releases of GOCE Satellite-Based Geopotential Models with EGM2008 and Terrestrial GPS/Levelling and Gravity Data over Egypt

El-Ashquer¹,

Elsaka²,

El-Fiky³

2016

IJG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) of GOCE (Gravity Recovery and steadystate Ocean Circulation Explorer) differ globally as well as regionally in their accuracy and resolution based on the maximum degree and order (d/o) of the fully normalized spherical harmonic (SH) coefficients, which express each GGM. The main idea of this study is to compare the free-air gravity anomalies and quasi geoid heights determined from several recent GOCE-based GGMs with the corresponding ones from the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) over Egypt on the one hand and with ground-based measurements on the other hand. The results regarding to the comparison of GOCE-based GGMs with terrestrial gravity and GPS/levelling data provide better improvement with respect to EGM2008. The 4th release GOCE-based GGM developed with the use of space-wise solution strategy (SPW_R4) approximates the gravity field well over the Egyptian region. The SPW_R4 model is accordingly suggested as a reference model for recovering the long wavelength (up to SH d/o 200) components of quasi geoid heights when modelling the gravimetric quasi-geoid over the Egypt. Finally, three types of transformation models: Four-, Fiveand Seven-parameter transformations have been applied to reduce the data biases and to provide a better fitting of quasi geoid heights obtained from the studied GOCE-based GGMs to those from GPS/levelling data. These models reveal that the standard deviation of vertical datum over Egypt is at the level of about 32 cm.

show abstract

Comparison of GGMs based on one year GOCE observations with the EGM08 and terrestrial data over the area of Sudan

Cited by 19 publications

References 13 publications

An Evaluation of Recent Global Geopotential Models for Strip Area Project in Turkey

An Evaluation of Recent Global Geopotential Models for Strip Area Project in Turkey

Introduction to the special issue on GOCE Earth science applications and models

On the Accuracy Assessment of the Latest Releases of GOCE Satellite-Based Geopotential Models with EGM2008 and Terrestrial GPS/Levelling and Gravity Data over Egypt

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About