2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066729
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Genomic and Epigenomic Expression in Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Rett Syndrome

Abstract: Monozygotic (identical) twins have been widely used in genetic studies to determine the relative contributions of heredity and the environment in human diseases. Discordance in disease manifestation between affected monozygotic twins has been attributed to either environmental factors or different patterns of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). However, recent studies have identified genetic and epigenetic differences between monozygotic twins, thereby challenging the accepted experimental model for distinguishin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with a recent report of an increase in copy number variations (CNV) in F3 generation, but not F1 generation descendants of vinclozolin-exposed dams [48], and corroborate previous reports suggesting that disruption of epigenetic programming can predispose multiple types of genetic aberrations [4958]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are consistent with a recent report of an increase in copy number variations (CNV) in F3 generation, but not F1 generation descendants of vinclozolin-exposed dams [48], and corroborate previous reports suggesting that disruption of epigenetic programming can predispose multiple types of genetic aberrations [4958]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings support the clinical observation that RTT patients present with a varied phenotype during childhood, and suggest that this may in part be related to the underlying genetic defect, in addition to X inactivation and other epigenetic factors which were not evaluated in this study. [19, 20]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding of CTCF to this methylation boundary (−595 to −389) prevents MECP2 silencing in human neuronal cells (Nagarajan et al 2008). A comparison of MECP2 promoter methylation in RTT monozygotic twins had been conducted before, which indicated no differences in the MECP2 promoter methylation between the twins (Miyake et al 2013). However, to conclude that promoter methylation does not play a role in RTT, a direct comparison of RTT patients to age-and gendermatched healthy individuals is necessary.…”
Section: Promoter Dna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%