2008
DOI: 10.17221/3096-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of general tree characteristics of less known oak species Quercus dalechampii Ten. and Quercus polycarpa Schur

Abstract: This study was designed to evaluate basic tree characteristics of <I>Quercus dalechampii</I> Ten. and <I>Quercus polycarpa</I> Schur and to find out differences between them. Total height, height of crown base and diameter at breast height were measured before tree felling. Cut stems were visually checked for heart rot on their basal parts. Diameters were measured on each stem in 1 meter long sections from the base to the point of life crown setting. Average values for both species were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, Q. dalechampii results more critical than Q. virgiliana about its taxonomic status; in fact, this species, described by Tenore (1811Tenore ( -1838, has been the subject of various contradictory interpretations in Europe. The most significant being its use to describe pinnatilobe forms regarding not only the cycle of Q. petraea but also that of Q. pubescens (Ascherson & Graebner, 1911;Camus, 1936-54;Schwarz, 1936-39;Savulescu, 1952;Davis, 1982;Mátyás, 1970;Pignatti, 1982;Schwarz, 1993;Brullo et al, 1999;Konrad & Wagner, 2007;Matula, 2008). Principally, Tenore (1830;1811-1838 distinguished this species by means of several features of leaves and fruits, but recently Brullo et al (1999) have lectotypified a specimen deposited into the Herbarium FI (Florence, Italy) and assigned to Q. dalechampii by Tenore: this lectotypus allows to identify Q. dalechampii as species more related to Q. pubescens than Q. petraea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, Q. dalechampii results more critical than Q. virgiliana about its taxonomic status; in fact, this species, described by Tenore (1811Tenore ( -1838, has been the subject of various contradictory interpretations in Europe. The most significant being its use to describe pinnatilobe forms regarding not only the cycle of Q. petraea but also that of Q. pubescens (Ascherson & Graebner, 1911;Camus, 1936-54;Schwarz, 1936-39;Savulescu, 1952;Davis, 1982;Mátyás, 1970;Pignatti, 1982;Schwarz, 1993;Brullo et al, 1999;Konrad & Wagner, 2007;Matula, 2008). Principally, Tenore (1830;1811-1838 distinguished this species by means of several features of leaves and fruits, but recently Brullo et al (1999) have lectotypified a specimen deposited into the Herbarium FI (Florence, Italy) and assigned to Q. dalechampii by Tenore: this lectotypus allows to identify Q. dalechampii as species more related to Q. pubescens than Q. petraea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2003) is the guide species of Querco dalechampii-Betuletum pendulae, a Greek mesophilous montane woodland that also includes Fagus sylvatica L., Epilobium montanum L., and Ru bus idaeus L. According to Brullo & al. (2008), Q. dalecham pii is a high-frequency species of the thermophilous Sicilian association Genisto aristae-Quercetum suberis, along with Pistacia lentiscus L., Daphne gnidium L., Cytisus infestus (C. Presl) Guss., and Rosa sempervirens L. Furthermore, the name Quercus dalechampii is widely cited in vegetation (Soó, 1964(Soó, -1980Požgaj & Nič, 2001;Biondi & al., 2004;Roleček, 2005;Costache, 2007;Brullo & al., 2008), forestry (Požgaj & al., 2004;Matula, 2008;Cvjetićanin & al., 2009), and conservation sciences (European Commission DG Environment, 2007;Davies & al., 2004). Michele Tenore's original and later descriptions of Quer cus dalechampii.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%