Comparison of General and Spinal Anesthesia on Maternal Hemoglobin Changes After Caesarean Section

Teimoori, Batool; Ghasemi, Marzie; Jahangirifard, Alireza; Mahjoubifard, Maziar; Enayati, H; Ostadmahmoodi, Tahere

doi:10.13005/bpj/1037

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other study on elective cesarean section had showed that compared to Hb before surgery, values of Hb in the first day after surgery in spinal group significantly reduced compared to general group [25]. Also, the results in current study are in agreement with other studies exhibited that bleeding and reduced PCV and Hb happen significantly fewer in spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia [25,[26][27][28][29]. The results in current study are inconsistent with few studies, one study showed that in comparison with GA, there was significantly fewer blood lost in epidural anesthesia but not in spinal anesthesia [30].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Effect of General and Spinal Anesthesia on Hepatic and Renal functions and Hemodynamic parameters of Iraqi Women Undergo Cesarean Section: Comparative Study

Mohammed

Alabbassi

Aldujaili³

et al. 2018

AJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Both general and spinal anesthesia can be use during caesarean section. Spinal anesthesia is preferred by anesthesiologists and gynecologists because of its beneficial effects for both mothers and their fetuses. They were not affecting the creatinine level but affecting only on elevation of liver enzymes. Spinal anesthesia effect on hemodynamic parameters more than general anesthesia, and it causes less operative blood loss than general anesthesia.

show abstract