2001
DOI: 10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11669215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of gene expression in CD34+ cells from bone marrow and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood by high-density oligonucleotide array analysis

Abstract: A prospective randomized trial has shown that there is a survival advantage for allogeneic transplant recipients who received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (GPBMC) versus those who received bone marrow (BM) as a source of stem cells. The biological basis for this advantage is not clear and may be attributable to qualitative as well as quantitative differences in the CD34 cells, T cells, and/or the monocytes transplanted. To begin to address this iss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the reduced CXCR-4 expression in CML CD34 þ cells might contribute to the release of malignant progenitor cells from BM. Surprisingly, we were unable to detect differentially expressed genes when comparing CML CD34 þ cells from BM with those from PB, although we and others had observed distinct molecular phenotypes when examining normal CD34 þ cells from BM and PB (Graf et al, 2001;Steidl et al, 2002;Ng et al, 2004). In normal BM CD34 þ cells, a significantly higher expression of genes governing cell-cycle progression was found in comparison to PB CD34 þ cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, the reduced CXCR-4 expression in CML CD34 þ cells might contribute to the release of malignant progenitor cells from BM. Surprisingly, we were unable to detect differentially expressed genes when comparing CML CD34 þ cells from BM with those from PB, although we and others had observed distinct molecular phenotypes when examining normal CD34 þ cells from BM and PB (Graf et al, 2001;Steidl et al, 2002;Ng et al, 2004). In normal BM CD34 þ cells, a significantly higher expression of genes governing cell-cycle progression was found in comparison to PB CD34 þ cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…[15] The mechanism of CD26 downregulation is unclear but does not seem to occur at gene expression level. (data not shown and [57,58]) If G-CSF directly induces increased motility of ssBM, then mobilized BM may be expected to also have enhanced homing compared to ssBM. However, BM cells from G-CSF treated mice neither display the same enhanced motility shown by MPB, nor the enhanced marrow homing, at least when tested on day 5, at the peak of mobilization (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…G-CSF mobilization and apheresis collection does result in significant changes in gene expression within the CD34 compartment when compared with bone marrow. 15 Other changes also occur in dendritic cell subsets after G-CSF mobilization. 16 In conclusion, we have examined the dose-response relationship of CD34 + cells in related and unrelated donor bone marrow or G-PBMC in terms of clinical outcomes such as engraftment, chronic GVHD and overall survival.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%