2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/707/1/012035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Ge, InGaAs p-n junction solar cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, problems in carrier collection, and nonoptimized ARC and window layer, could also be responsible for such a reduction. The InGaAs bottom cell showed an excellent PV performance: J SC of 41.2 mA/cm 2 , V OC of 369.9 mV and FF of 74.5%, providing an overall h of 11.4% which is close to the theoretical value reported in [42] The experimental dark J-V curves were then fitted to a two-diode model to have a better insight into the characteristics of the devices [43]. One ideality factor has been fixed equal to 1, so the fit parameters are: one ideality factor, n, the saturation current densities J 01 and J 02 , and the series and shunt resistances, R s and R sh , respectively.…”
Section: Single Junction Cellssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, problems in carrier collection, and nonoptimized ARC and window layer, could also be responsible for such a reduction. The InGaAs bottom cell showed an excellent PV performance: J SC of 41.2 mA/cm 2 , V OC of 369.9 mV and FF of 74.5%, providing an overall h of 11.4% which is close to the theoretical value reported in [42] The experimental dark J-V curves were then fitted to a two-diode model to have a better insight into the characteristics of the devices [43]. One ideality factor has been fixed equal to 1, so the fit parameters are: one ideality factor, n, the saturation current densities J 01 and J 02 , and the series and shunt resistances, R s and R sh , respectively.…”
Section: Single Junction Cellssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is important to note that Pt nanoparticles play a key role in catalyzing water reduction reaction efficiently, see the Supplementary Experimental Section, and such GaN nanostructures provide enormous catalytic sites for Pt deposition that significantly facilitate water reduction reaction of platinized GaN/3J samples. Considering the small photovoltage of ∼0.3 V provided by the bottom Ge junction, compared to the large photo voltage in the presented device, we can reasonably conclude that a GaN-protected GaInP 2 /GaAs double-junction tandem structure can drive unassisted solar water splitting with significantly improved (light-limited) efficiency. In addition, the use of RuO x , IrO x , or other high-performance counter electrodes can lead to improved performance. ,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Our reconfigurable TPV platform, demonstrated using standard silicon fabrication process technology, can be scaled for harnessing waste heat by proper engineering of heat channels from source to emitter 52 .Considering the current state-of-art germanium photovoltaic detectors with quantum efficiency of over 10%, we can significantly improve the overall efficiency of our TPV (>4 mW cm −2 ) 53 . Leveraging the NEMS technology also allows us to overcome fabrication limitations by making TPV cells with larger initial gaps between emitter and detector, which In the hot-stack, chromium (Cr) film helps in adhesion and nucleation of tungsten thin-film, while a-Si provides mechanical support when the bridge is suspended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our TPV cells are currently limited by the low efficiency (𝜂 𝐷 ≈ 0.3 × 10 −4 ) of Ge photodetector due to high contact resistance and low doping concentrations of the active region (see supplementary section 7). Considering that the photodetectors at this spectral range have been widely demonstrated with efficiency as high as 10%, we expect our heat recycling efficiency could be significantly higher (> 10 mW ⋅ cm −2 ) 48 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%