2002
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18.489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Gamma-ray Spectrometry and Delayed Neutron Counting for Determination of Uranium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bulk chemical analyses were performed by SGS Minerals Services of Toronto, Canada, using a combination of x-ray fluorescence (Si, Ti, Al, Fe, MN, Mg, Ca, K, P, Rb, Sr, Zr, Ba), neutron activation (Na, Cr, As, Br, Sb, REE, Hg, Th), coulometry (CO 2 ), and Leco instrument (S). Uranium was determined by delayed neutron counting (detection limit = 0.1 ppm; Aldayel et al, 2002). Total organic carbon (TOC) was analyzed by Geolab Nor, Trondheim, using a Leco CS244 instrument.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk chemical analyses were performed by SGS Minerals Services of Toronto, Canada, using a combination of x-ray fluorescence (Si, Ti, Al, Fe, MN, Mg, Ca, K, P, Rb, Sr, Zr, Ba), neutron activation (Na, Cr, As, Br, Sb, REE, Hg, Th), coulometry (CO 2 ), and Leco instrument (S). Uranium was determined by delayed neutron counting (detection limit = 0.1 ppm; Aldayel et al, 2002). Total organic carbon (TOC) was analyzed by Geolab Nor, Trondheim, using a Leco CS244 instrument.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%