1990
DOI: 10.1049/el:19901338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of full wave approaches for determination of microstrip conductor losses for MMIC applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our wide-microstrip model has the following range of applicability: width of the microstrip is 3.5; conductor height is 0.472; dielectric permittivity is 2.7 12.9. Its accuracy is verified with theoretical and experimental results [3]- [7] for frequencies up to 100 GHz (see Figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: A Wide Microstrip Linessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our wide-microstrip model has the following range of applicability: width of the microstrip is 3.5; conductor height is 0.472; dielectric permittivity is 2.7 12.9. Its accuracy is verified with theoretical and experimental results [3]- [7] for frequencies up to 100 GHz (see Figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: A Wide Microstrip Linessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Squares-full-wave data [7]; diamonds-full-wave data [6]; circles-full-wave data [7]. Microstrip line parameters: 1) w=h =0.1; 2) w=h =0.7; 3), 4) w=h =3.5; = 6.5, h = 0.2 m, = 12.9, h = 100 m, h = h + h , t = 12 m.…”
Section: B Narrow Microstrip Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…65) is like that seen in[24] and gives similar variation to[25] 3 . The three cases in (61), (64), and (65) generate the three modified dyadic Green's functions (note that ), shown in (66)-(68), at the bottom of this page 3.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…That is, the unit normal vector crossed into the dyadic magnetic Green's function, then multiplied by the surface current, yields the same result as the dyadic magnetic Green's function multiplied by the surface current, followed by a cross-product multiplication by the unit normal vector. Equation (22) is a rather remarkable result, as it allows us to write down by inspection the new Green's function for the finite-sized and finite-conductivity metal strip in our anisotropic layered structure (24) We will not pursue this approach further, other than to say that, although the form has been presented, it does not prove that, in fact, such a closed-form representation can be found. Instead, in order to have some specific rules for constructing the average, resort to a procedure found in [22].…”
Section: General Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%