2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fracture behavior between acrylic and epoxy adhesives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process results in a resin with improved mechanical properties that, in combination to the low shrinkage attained, offers the highest stability. Furthermore, it can also provide greater resistance in coating surfaces and higher adhesion strength, making the resultant resins suitable for several industrial applications such as paints, adhesives, high-performance membranes, and so on [34,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process results in a resin with improved mechanical properties that, in combination to the low shrinkage attained, offers the highest stability. Furthermore, it can also provide greater resistance in coating surfaces and higher adhesion strength, making the resultant resins suitable for several industrial applications such as paints, adhesives, high-performance membranes, and so on [34,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When interpreting the data obtained from joint specimens, it should also be remembered that most of the adhesive is subjected to a triaxial stress state which, apart from increasing the stiffness, will probably affect the yield or failure behaviour. The triaxial stress state depends on the adhesive itself, as was shown in Imanaka et al [56] for an epoxy and an acrylic adhesive. The popular belief that an adhesive has different properties in bulk or in joints is essentially due to the fact that, in almost all bonded specimens, the adhesive layer is in a complex and non-uniform state of stress [57].…”
Section: Bulk Structural Adhesive or Joint Testing?mentioning
confidence: 84%