1991
DOI: 10.1021/ac00022a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Fourier self-deconvolution and maximum likelihood restoration for curve fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the exact composition of the coal is not known, the selection of parameters, such as the number, position, and width of the bands, is not straightforward. The application of Fourier self-deconvolution, maximum likelihood restoration, and the calculation of derivative spectra has been shown capable of narrowing bandwidths in order to facilitate the selection of these parameters [11,12]. However, these techniques provide poor results for spectra with highly overlapped bands, baseline errors or high noise levels [11,12] Although coal spectra typically exhibit these shortcomings, some of these approaches have been utilized [9,13].…”
Section: E Ft-ir Spectroscopy Methods For Carboxyl and Phenolic Groumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since the exact composition of the coal is not known, the selection of parameters, such as the number, position, and width of the bands, is not straightforward. The application of Fourier self-deconvolution, maximum likelihood restoration, and the calculation of derivative spectra has been shown capable of narrowing bandwidths in order to facilitate the selection of these parameters [11,12]. However, these techniques provide poor results for spectra with highly overlapped bands, baseline errors or high noise levels [11,12] Although coal spectra typically exhibit these shortcomings, some of these approaches have been utilized [9,13].…”
Section: E Ft-ir Spectroscopy Methods For Carboxyl and Phenolic Groumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of Fourier self-deconvolution, maximum likelihood restoration, and the calculation of derivative spectra has been shown capable of narrowing bandwidths in order to facilitate the selection of these parameters [11,12]. However, these techniques provide poor results for spectra with highly overlapped bands, baseline errors or high noise levels [11,12] Although coal spectra typically exhibit these shortcomings, some of these approaches have been utilized [9,13]. As an alternative to the approach mentioned above, Solomon et al [14,15] defined a set of 24 Gaussian bands with fixed positions and widths that could reproduce coal spectra within the experimental error.…”
Section: E Ft-ir Spectroscopy Methods For Carboxyl and Phenolic Groumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If r is too much low,it will appear pretend peaks and can't get right results [10][11][12] . Hence, before fitting, we should get the E under the different r on the same initial condition, and the right range of r under the convergent value E by E(r) curve.…”
Section: Adjustment Strategy and Algorithm Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curve fitting [9][10][11][12] , as the analytical method of overlapping peaks, is based on the principle of least squares. It analyzes the original spectrum to one or more single peak, and then makes a sum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently, however, deblurring is not possible or it is insufficient to resolve the relevant bands in a spectrum. Curve fitting can be used, either in conjunction with deblurring 96,98 or as an alternative method, to separate overlapping peaks. 93,[126][127][128] Because curve fitting has a utility related to deblurring, it is addressed here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%