1992
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1992.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For CRC, CA 19-9 levels add little clinically useful information to determine CEA levels [5]. The low diagnostic power of CA 19-9 may be due to a high proportion of colorectal cancer patients having the Lewis (a-b-) phenotype, who cannot synthesize these markers [6]. The overall reported incidences of high pre-CA 19-9 range from 10.6% to 24.4% [7-11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CRC, CA 19-9 levels add little clinically useful information to determine CEA levels [5]. The low diagnostic power of CA 19-9 may be due to a high proportion of colorectal cancer patients having the Lewis (a-b-) phenotype, who cannot synthesize these markers [6]. The overall reported incidences of high pre-CA 19-9 range from 10.6% to 24.4% [7-11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of this neoplasia have been widely described [2, 3]. However, it is not recommended to be employed alone as a screening or diagnostic test for colorectal cancer [4], and it has been used combined with other tumor markers [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a variety of serum tumor markers including CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 125 has been applied to the detection of CRC [1,2], serum levels of such markers are not increased in the early stages of CRC. CA 19-9 is a cancerassociated carbohydrate antigen that plays a critical role in tumor progression as an adhesion molecule; however, CA 19-9 is less sensitive than CEA, which is currently regarded as the best reliable serum marker for CRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%