2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2003)129:3(271)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Four Modeling Techniques for Short-Term AADT Forecasting in Hong Kong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the 1-nearest neighbor NPR model was adopted for forecasting in this study. For details of the NPR method refer to Tang et al (2003).…”
Section: Neural Network (Nn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the 1-nearest neighbor NPR model was adopted for forecasting in this study. For details of the NPR method refer to Tang et al (2003).…”
Section: Neural Network (Nn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier study (Tang et al 2003), four (two parametric and two non-parametric) models for short-term prediction of daily traffic flows by day of the week and by month of the whole current year were investigated to estimate the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) in Hong Kong. These four models were developed on the basis of the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving-Average (ARIMA), Neural Network (NN), NonParametric Regression (NPR) and Gaussian Maximum Likelihood (GML) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two measures of model performance, namely, the mean absolute error (MAE) and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) have been adopted to evaluate the prediction results. [11][12][13][14] Other evaluation indicators should be considered, including time and effort required for model development, transferability of results, skills and expertise required, adaptability to changing temporal or spatial behavior, to name a few. 10,[15][16][17] In this study, the performance of three representative modeling approaches is compared with real-life data in Beijing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after its publication, the GML (Gaussian Maximum Likekihood) approach, proposed in [5], has been compared with other models, such as non-parametric regression, ARIMA, neural networks, online SVR, and smoothing techniques, concluding that GML-based predictor presented the best forecasting performance, under typical traffic conditions [15], [23], [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%