1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80627-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four Doppler echocardiographic methods for calculating pulmonary-to-systemic shunt flow ratios in patients with ventricular septal defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-invasive techniques based on echocardiography using spectral Doppler velocitytime integral and vessel area have been developed but faced with considerable limitations in terms of accuracy and reproducibility [27]. CMR flow assessment has been validated extensively in vivo and in vitro [28] with less than 5% difference when compared to Fick calculation and thermodilution.…”
Section: Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-invasive techniques based on echocardiography using spectral Doppler velocitytime integral and vessel area have been developed but faced with considerable limitations in terms of accuracy and reproducibility [27]. CMR flow assessment has been validated extensively in vivo and in vitro [28] with less than 5% difference when compared to Fick calculation and thermodilution.…”
Section: Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method of estimating RVP has been well established and is widely used because a better method of tricuspid regurgitation is not available for the majority of patients. The method for estimation of Q p :Q s in this study is not the best, but it is a good method [37] and is applicable in all VSDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Measurements were made between the inner border of the vessel wall during the greatest systolic expansion of the vessels. This method was shown to correlate well with the measurements of Q p :Q s derived from oxymetric data at heart catheterization but not as well as with the shunt determination through the VSD [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because the flow rate and vessel area are not measured directly, the accuracy and reproducibility of this method is limited and hence they are not used routinely in clinical care. 81 CMR overcomes these limitations by measuring flow rate and vessel cross-sectional area independent of vessel location and geometry. In patients with an atrial septal defect, CMR measurement of Qp/Qs agreed well with estimation based on invasive oximetry (mean difference between techniques, 0.06 Qp/Qs units or 2.6%) and had low interobserver variability (Ͻ4%).…”
Section: Hemodynamic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%