WCC 2000 - ICSP 2000. 2000 5th International Conference on Signal Processing Proceedings. 16th World Computer Congress 2000
DOI: 10.1109/icosp.2000.891678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four different digital watermarking techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Gaussian white noise and pepper-salt-noise (b) [3,3] and [5,5] Fig.3, watermarking image cannot be well extracted from the embedded image when the attack is serious. The robustness of noise and compression is the best.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) Gaussian white noise and pepper-salt-noise (b) [3,3] and [5,5] Fig.3, watermarking image cannot be well extracted from the embedded image when the attack is serious. The robustness of noise and compression is the best.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, we can classify digital watermark into two classes depending on the domain of watermark embedding, i.e., the spatial domain and the transform domain, where the properties of the underlying domain can be exploited. Previous works have shown that the transform domain scheme is typically more robust to noise, common image processing, and compression when compared with the spatial transform scheme [1]- [3]. According to the need for original data during the watermark detection process, digital watermark can be also classified into private and public (or blind) algorithms [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The watermark is embedded to the large wavelet coefficients at high and middle frequency bands of the image's DWT. Song et al [3] gave the comparison of difference watermarking techniques by focus on the evaluation of robustness and visual quality property. S. H. Yang [4] has concentrated on the evaluation of biorthogonal wavelets using spread-spectrum watermarking framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, digital watermarking can be classified into two classes depending on the domain of watermark embedding, i.e., the spatial and the transform domain. Previous works have shown that the transform domain scheme is typically more robust to noise, common image processing, and compression, compared to the spatial transform scheme [1]- [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%