Comparison of Four Different Dental Implant Removal Techniques in Terms of the Weight and Volume of Bone Loss

Abstract

Purpose: Several approaches have been suggested for implant removal. However, further research is necessary to review data regarding the amount of bone removed and the duration of removal time for different procedures. This study evaluates and compares various implant removal techniques.Materials and methods: A polyurethane block was scanned to create an implant surgical guide. Afterward, implant-guided surgery was performed on 60 simulated bone blocks. The implants were then separated into four groups and removed utilizing the counter-torque ratchet, trephine drills, burs, and piezosurgery.Results: For the weight of bone loss, there were significant differences in the median between the countertorque ratchet technique (CTRT) and trephine (p < 0.01), CTRT and bur (p < 0.01), trephine and piezo (p < 0.01), and bur and piezo (p = 0.04). All groups, except CTRT and the piezo group, demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) in the procedure durations. Regarding the volume of bone loss, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was found between each group.Conclusions: CTRT showed the least amount of bone loss. On the other hand, the trephine technique was demonstrated to be the fastest. It is essential to consider the limitations and risks when choosing the approach for implant removal.