1980
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(80)90347-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four calibration techniques of a silver activated Geiger counter for the determination of the neutron yield on the Frascati plasma focus experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison shows that the (n, c) reaction rate for Am-Be neutrons is about 16.5 % less than that of 2.5 MeV neutrons. This has been also shown in Gentilini et al's [18] measurements that the K value changes from 3.89 ± 1.00 9 10 7 neutrons per shot to 3.40 ± 0.85 9 10 7 neutrons per shot for Am-B and Am-Be neutron sources, respectively, which gives about 13 % error for calibration factor value.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison shows that the (n, c) reaction rate for Am-Be neutrons is about 16.5 % less than that of 2.5 MeV neutrons. This has been also shown in Gentilini et al's [18] measurements that the K value changes from 3.89 ± 1.00 9 10 7 neutrons per shot to 3.40 ± 0.85 9 10 7 neutrons per shot for Am-B and Am-Be neutron sources, respectively, which gives about 13 % error for calibration factor value.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…According to Gentilini et al [18], there are at least four calibration constant measurement methods among which it has been decided to incorporate the count rate measurement at saturation, following Etaati et al [19], whose more general approach is comparable to Gentillini et al's. In this method, the purpose is the measurement of thermal neutron flux per unit neutron source (i.e., c value) in the detectors, for which at t = t 0 a neutron source with intensity I 0 (in neutron/s unit) is placed at the position where the plasma is formed in the PF device.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these twenty shots, fifteen shots with higher neutron yield were selected and the mean value of these was calculated. Detector calibration was done with an Am-Be source and with source removal method (Gentilini et al 1980). Aluminum sample, which was irradiated by hydrogen ions in each mentioned height, was punctured at the place of maximum ion density.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counts being taken for two 100-s period immediately after the focus is fired. Calibration is performed with source removal method [16] using a 5Ci Am-Be reference neutron source. In SBUPF1 we also studied the amplitude of neutron signal pulse as detected by a PMT + plastic scintillator.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%