2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of foot segmental mobility and coupling during gait between patients with diabetes mellitus with and without neuropathy and adults without diabetes

Abstract: Background: Reduction in foot mobility has been identified as a key factor of altered foot biomechanics in individuals with diabetes mellitus. This study aimed at comparing in vivo segmental foot kinematics and coupling in patients with diabetes with and without neuropathy to control adults. Methods: Foot mobility of 13 diabetic patients with neuropathy, 13 diabetic patients without neuropathy and 13 non-diabetic persons was measured using an integrated measurement set-up including a plantar pressure platform … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduction in joint motion is more pronounced in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy, and has been observed during the propulsive and swing stages of gait [15] . Alterations in foot biomechanics and balance issues secondary to peripheral neuropathy are important factors which could lead to ground level falls and trauma (Table 2).…”
Section: Disturbances Of Gaitmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reduction in joint motion is more pronounced in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy, and has been observed during the propulsive and swing stages of gait [15] . Alterations in foot biomechanics and balance issues secondary to peripheral neuropathy are important factors which could lead to ground level falls and trauma (Table 2).…”
Section: Disturbances Of Gaitmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Patients with DM often have limitation of motion in the foot and ankle, resulting in biomechanical abnormalities [15] . This reduction in joint motion is more pronounced in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy, and has been observed during the propulsive and swing stages of gait [15] .…”
Section: Disturbances Of Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turner et al [6], using the same modified Oxford multi-segmental foot model used in this study, also report no difference in hindfoot relative to shank excursion between those with and without diabetes and foot complications. However, Deschamp et al [24] and Rao et al [25], using slightly different foot models, report a reduction in hindfoot relative to shank excursion during walking in those with DMPN compared to healthy controls. Past work using single segment foot models have been similarly inconsistent when examining motion between the foot segment and the shank [2630].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is our hypothesis that kinematic analysis of walking, particularly at slow walking speeds (around 1 m/s), may not be a task that is consistently sensitive to changes associated with chronic diabetes. Total sagittal plane excursion of the foot segment relative to the shank across studies is surprisingly similar, most within a range of 15° to 20° [6,24,28], and group differences range from 2° to 7° [6,24,25]. Future study would benefit from inclusion of kinematic analysis of tasks that are more challenging and clearly and consistently measure deficits associated with complications from chronic diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Deschamps et al 2013;Hastings et al 2014;Rao et al 2007;Sawacha et al 2009;Turner et al 2007) The inconsistency in measuring differences in inter-segmental foot motion and ankle power during walking may be, in part, related to weaker expression of kinematic abnormalities during the walking task. Walking is a general lower extremity task, allowing compensation by the hip and knee for foot limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%