Comparison of Foot Morphology between Chinese and Mongolian Children

Ran, Shiya; Líu, Hao; Yan, Shiyang; Li, Ruoyi; Baďurová, Jitka; Yang, Luming

doi:10.24264/lfj.20.2.1

Cited by 5 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fifty-three studies reported mean height (ranging from 100.9 to 187.8 cm) and 52 reported height standard deviation [ 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 16 , 18 , 22 , 30 – 32 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 41 – 52 , 54 – 56 , 58 , 59 , 61 – 64 , 68 – 72 , 74 , 75 , 84 – 91 , 93 , 94 ]. Fifty-four studies reported mean weight (ranging from 15.7 to 111.8 kg) and 53 reported weight standard deviation [ 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 16 , 18 , 22 , 30 – 33 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 41 – 52 , 54 – 56 , 58 , 59 , 61 – 64 , 68 – 72 , 74 , 75 , 84 – 91 , 93 , 94 ]. Twenty-four studies reported BMI mean (ranging from 15.2 to 32.9 kg/m 2 ), and 23 reported standard deviation [ 18 , 20 , 21 , 34 , 35 , 41...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The included studies originated from 17 different countries: China ( n = 41) [4, 11, 30–68], Japan ( n = 6) [16, 44, 69–72], Germany ( n = 4) [13, 73–75], Romania ( n = 3) [8, 76, 77], South Korea ( n = 3) [78–80], Spain ( n = 3) [22, 81, 82], United States ( n = 3) [83–85], Italy ( n = 3) [20, 21, 86], India ( n = 2) [5, 87], Malaysia ( n = 2) [3, 88], New Zealand ( n = 2) [35, 62], Australia ( n = 2) [89, 90], Belgium ( n = 2) [18, 91], United Kingdom ( n = 2) [92, 93], Canada ( n = 1) [94], Iran ( n = 1) [9], Russia ( n = 1) [47], Slovenia ( n = 1) [95], and Sweden ( n = 1) [75]. Several study designs were utilised in the literature, these included: 51 comparisons of mean differences between groups [3, 5, 8, 9, 22, …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several study designs were utilised in the literature, these included: 51 comparisons of mean differences between groups [3, 5, 8, 9, 22, 30–35, 38–41, 43–45, 47–50, 52–62, 66, 68, 70, 72, 75–78, 80, 83, 85–89, 93–95], 20 cluster/principal component analyses [5, 11, 13, 16, 18, 31, 32, 38, 42, 51, 58, 63, 64, 68, 73, 79, 82, 85, 87, 90], 14 reliability studies [20–22, 34, 37, 39, 48, 49, 53, 75, 78, 88, 90, 91], 10 validation studies [20, 21, …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sample size ranged from 11 to 1,200,847, with 57 studies including healthy young adults [3, 4, 8, 11, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 30–40, 42–46, 48–50, 54–56, 59–61, 63–71, 74, 77, 78, 80–84, 87, 88, 90, 91, 93, 94]. Other groups included: older adults (> 65 years) ( n = 18) [8, 9, 34, 38, 45, 56, 61, 70, 72, 74, 77, 82–84, 87, 91, 93, 94], children/adolescents (< 18 years) ( n = 11) [5, 13, 37, 38, 41, 52, 56, 75, 80, 89, 92], participants with medical conditions ( n = 7) (such as Down syndrome […”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fifty‐four studies reported minimum age (ranging from 2 to 69 years), maximum age (ranging from 7 to 87 years), and age range (2 to 87 years) [3–5, 9, 11, 16, 18, 20, 21, 30–34, 36–42, 46, 48–50, 52, 54, 55, 59, 60, 63–68, 70, 72, 74, 75, 77, 78, 80–84, 88–94]. Fifty‐three studies reported mean height (ranging from 100.9 to 187.8 cm) and 52 reported height standard deviation [3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 16, 18, 22, 30–32, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41–52, 54–56, 58, 59, 61–64, 68–72, 74, 75,…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three‐dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review

Allan

Munteanu

Bonanno

et al. 2023

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The objectives of this study were to: (i) review and provide a narrative synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) foot surface scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocols, and (ii) develop a set of recommendations for standardising the reporting of 3D foot scanning approaches. Methods A systematic search of the SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were conducted to identify papers reporting 3D foot scanning protocols and analysis techniques. To be included, studies were required to be published in English, have more than ten participants, and involve the use of static 3D surface scans of the foot. Papers were excluded if they reported two-dimensional footprints only, 3D scans that did not include the medial arch, dynamic scans, or derived foot data from a full body scan. Results The search yielded 78 relevant studies from 17 different countries. The available evidence showed a large variation in scanning protocols. The subcategories displaying the most variation included scanner specifications (model, type, accuracy, resolution, capture duration), scanning conditions (markers, weightbearing, number of scans), foot measurements and definitions used, and statistical analysis approaches. A 16-item checklist was developed to improve the consistency of reporting of future 3D scanning studies. Conclusion 3D foot scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocol consistency and reporting has been lacking in the literature to date. Improved reporting of the included subcategories could assist in data pooling and facilitate collaboration between researchers. As a result, larger sample sizes and diversification of population groups could be obtained to vastly improve the quantification of foot shape and inform the development of orthotic and footwear interventions and products.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three‐dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review

Allan

Munteanu

Bonanno

et al. 2023

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Methodological and Statistical Approaches for the Assessment of Foot Shape Using Three-Dimensional Foot Scanning: A Scoping Review

ALLAN,

MUNTEANU,

BONANNO

et al. 2023

Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH 2023 - 14th International Conference and Exhibition on 3D Body Scanning and Processing Technologies,

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The objectives of this study were to: (i) review and provide a narrative synthesis of threedimensional (3D) foot surface scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocols, and (ii) develop a set of recommendations for standardising the reporting of 3D foot scanning approaches.Methods A systematic search of the SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were conducted to identify papers reporting 3D foot scanning protocols and analysis techniques. To be included, studies were required to be published in English, have more than ten participants, and involve the use of static 3D surface scans of the foot.Papers were excluded if they reported two-dimensional footprints only, 3D scans that did not include the medial arch, dynamic scans, or derived foot data from a full body scan. ResultsThe search yielded 78 relevant studies from 17 different countries. The available evidence showed a large variation in scanning protocols. The subcategories displaying the most variation included scanner specifications (model, type, accuracy, resolution, capture duration), scanning conditions (markers, weightbearing, number of scans), foot measurements and definitions used, and statistical analysis approaches. A 16-item checklist was developed to improve the consistency of reporting of future 3D scanning studies. Conclusion 3D foot scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocol consistency and reporting has been lacking in the literature to date. Improved reporting of the included subcategories could assist in data pooling and facilitate collaboration between researchers. As a result, larger sample sizes and diversification of population groups could be obtained to vastly improve the quantification of foot shape and inform the development of orthotic and footwear interventions and products.

show abstract

Environmental Factors as a Cause of Differences in the Feet of Ecuadorian Children and Its Relation to Their Footwear

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to analyze the differences in foot measurements of Ecuadorian children according to their geographical location of residence, taking into account climatic differences (1). A total of 1662 children (2) participated in the study. Three groups were established: coast, mountains and amazonia. The type of footwear (3) used was recorded and the lengths, widths, perimeters, heights and angles of both (4) feet were analyzed with a 3D foot digitizer (5). The variable ‘fitting of the foot to footwear’ was also obtained. Children living in coastal areas presented greater lengths, widths, perimeters and heights compared to those living in the mountain (p > 0.001) and amazonia (p < 0.001) between ages 5 to 13. Mountain residents showed a greater first toe angle than coast residents (p > 0.001) aged 8 to 17. Children used shoes smaller than required by their foot length (p < 0.01). Ecuadorian children from the coast presented longer and wider feet with higher foot arches, whilst those from mountains presented greater first toe angle. The studied sample used footwear up to one size smaller than the size corresponding to their foot length. The fitting and type of footwear used according to climatic differences could be interfering with normal foot development.

show abstract

Comparison of Foot Morphology between Chinese and Mongolian Children

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three‐dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review

Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three‐dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review

Methodological and Statistical Approaches for the Assessment of Foot Shape Using Three-Dimensional Foot Scanning: A Scoping Review

Environmental Factors as a Cause of Differences in the Feet of Ecuadorian Children and Its Relation to Their Footwear

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About