1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-005x(98)00036-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of foaming and interfacial properties of pure sucrose monolaurates, dilaurate and commercial preparations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with this, Gal16 and Xyl16 did not reduce the surface tension as much as the other palmitate esters. From a technological point of view, surfactants with a high Krafft point are frequently still of use in various applications; there are reports in the literature of efficient sugar surfactants at temperatures below their Krafft point (29). Gal18:1, on the other hand, was fully soluble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with this, Gal16 and Xyl16 did not reduce the surface tension as much as the other palmitate esters. From a technological point of view, surfactants with a high Krafft point are frequently still of use in various applications; there are reports in the literature of efficient sugar surfactants at temperatures below their Krafft point (29). Gal18:1, on the other hand, was fully soluble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sz ts et al studied the dissolution process and revealed that the gelling of the sucrose esters was temperature and concentration dependent and the stronger gel structure had a significant effect on the drug release [20]. They are also applied in cosmetical preparations [21] and food additives [22]. ck Adding 0.3% sucrose esters In the present study, sucrose esters were used to improve some properties of wheat starch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Parameters derived from the Figure 2 plots-the critical micellar concentration (CMC), γ (at C = CMC), the surface excess (Γ), and the surface area per surfactant (A s ) are given in Table 1 [28][29][30]. The surface tension for sucrose laurate achieved by us 19.7 mN/m, is lower than values reported for the same ester in the literature, 35-40 mN/m [31][32][33]; also, the CMC reported in Table 1 (0.63 g/L) is higher than reported values, 0.1-0.2 g/L [24,31,33], with the lower temperature used in our studies (22˝C) compared to those used in the cited reports (25-37˝C) being at least partially attributable to the latter difference [34]. Compared to sucrose laurate, technical-grade Catalysts 2016, 6, 78 4 of 13 sucrose oleate yielded a slightly higher γ (29.6 mN/m) and a higher CMC, the latter trend reflecting the lower purity and polarity for sucrose oleate [31,34].…”
Section: Composition and Surface Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%