2017
DOI: 10.1080/00779962.2017.1398704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fluorescent lights with differing spectral properties on catches of adult aquatic and terrestrial insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and C. imicola than either the 220‐V or 12‐V traps fitted with various coloured LEDs. The greater attractiveness of UV light is a well‐known phenomenon in a number of insect species (Pohe et al ., ), including C. imicola (Venter & Hermanides, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and C. imicola than either the 220‐V or 12‐V traps fitted with various coloured LEDs. The greater attractiveness of UV light is a well‐known phenomenon in a number of insect species (Pohe et al ., ), including C. imicola (Venter & Hermanides, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Szanyi 2018, 2019). Researchers generally use mercuryvapour lamps and black light lamps for collecting caddisflies and also moths (Blahnik and Holzenthal 2004;Calor and Mariano 2012) since the attraction of caddisflies to near-ultraviolet radiation has been known for a long time (Chernyshev 1961;Mikkola 1972;Blomberg 1976;Walker and Galbreath 1979;Pohe et al 2017). Although between them mercury-vapour lamps are seen more efficient (Mikkola 1972;Blomberg 1976;Walker and Galbreath 1979), but shorter wavelength light sources generally attract higher were caught only with mercury-vapour (MV) and UV2 light sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high attractivity of the mercury-vapour lamp for caddisflies (Mikkola 1972;Blomberg 1976;Walker and Galbreath 1979) and the role of its UV spectra were also proven (e.g., Chernyshev 1961;Calor and Mariano 2012;Pohe et al 2017), thus this trap type and black light lamps became the most widely used standard light source types in caddisfly sampling (Blahnik and Holzenthal 2004;Calor and Mariano 2012). According to Mikkola (1972) the eyes of Trichoptera are similar to Lepidoptera and sensitive for 350-600 nm wavelength, with a maximum around 550 nm, but the effect of spectral distribution of light sources on caddisflies is poorly known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specimens of Acanthophlebia cruentata were collected at small gravel streams in catchments with native vegetation, either as nymphs by hand searching stones or kick-sampling with a net, or, on emergence by UV trapping [ 11 , 36 ]. Specimens were preserved in ethanol for subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%