2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006jb004311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fluid tiltmeter data with long‐period seismograms: Surface waves and Earth's free oscillations

Abstract: We compare observations of long‐period seismic surface waves and free oscillations recorded by high‐resolution long‐base fluid tube tiltmeters and by nearby broadband seismometers after large earthquakes. The quality of the tiltmeter data is comparable to that of the best horizontal component seismic data, recording some of the gravest free oscillations of the Earth, as well as successive passages of seismic surface waves circling the globe. We compare the observations with theoretical seismograms and with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earthquakes of the 1960s spurred the development of global networks of digital seismometers (Fels & Berger 1994; Stutzmann et al 2000; Butler et al 2004), so that seismic motions can now be measured with a dynamic range of 10 7 with minimal non‐linear distortion. Since the 1964 Alaskan quake, other geophysical technologies have been invented or have grown more precise, so that the seismic motion of great earthquakes can be studied with data from new perspectives, for example, superconducting gravimeters (van Camp 1999), tiltmeters (Ferreira et al 2006) and GPS receivers (Larson et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthquakes of the 1960s spurred the development of global networks of digital seismometers (Fels & Berger 1994; Stutzmann et al 2000; Butler et al 2004), so that seismic motions can now be measured with a dynamic range of 10 7 with minimal non‐linear distortion. Since the 1964 Alaskan quake, other geophysical technologies have been invented or have grown more precise, so that the seismic motion of great earthquakes can be studied with data from new perspectives, for example, superconducting gravimeters (van Camp 1999), tiltmeters (Ferreira et al 2006) and GPS receivers (Larson et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…accelerate a full cup of hot coffee horizontally without tilting it and a painful experience will be the result). Examples for this are presented by Ferreira et al (2006) using records of the free oscillations excited by the great 2004 N. Sumatra–Andaman Islands quake from a 40 m water‐tube tiltmeter in Luxembourg and from a 120 m differential‐pressure fluid‐tiltmeter at Black Forest Observatory (BFO, see below). Comparing the data with predictions demonstrates that these tiltmeters sense predominantly the inertial accelerations associated with the toroidal modes, which on a spherically symmetric earth do not cause tilts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Station S1, which is nearest to the slide, exhibits maximum tilt values of approximately −2000 nrad for the x component and 3000 nrad in y direction. Regarding a present‐day tiltmeter accuracy of 1 nrad or less [ d'Oreye and Zürn , 2005; Ferreira et al , 2006; Gebauer et al , 2007], a huge landslide of the Storegga scale will be clearly detectable.…”
Section: Landslide Remote Sensing Via Tiltmetersmentioning
confidence: 99%