2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of flap and flapless procedures for the stability of chemically modified SLA titanium implants: an experimental study in a canine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A importância da precisão cirúrgica, neste caso clínico, não foi só para o posicionamento ideal dos implantes, mas também pela proximidade com estruturas nobres, como o nervo alveolar inferior. O planejamento prévio e a confecção do guia cirúrgico possibilitou uma maior precisão durante a instalação dos implantes, trazendo maior comodidade ao paciente 15 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A importância da precisão cirúrgica, neste caso clínico, não foi só para o posicionamento ideal dos implantes, mas também pela proximidade com estruturas nobres, como o nervo alveolar inferior. O planejamento prévio e a confecção do guia cirúrgico possibilitou uma maior precisão durante a instalação dos implantes, trazendo maior comodidade ao paciente 15 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Bone loss of 0.7 to 2.14 mm has been shown in some animal studies after flapless insertion, 21,46,47 while in another study, no statistically significant difference was recorded. 48 Flapless insertion resulted in higher and earlier implant stability in one animal study, 49 while was excluded. Regardless of the insertion depth, but depending on the surgical procedure, both groups showed significantly higher bone loss around the implant shoulder when a mucoperiosteal flap was reflected ( Table 2).…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Another study concluded flapless surgical placement may result in increased initial implant stability compared to implants placed with a mucoperiostal flap. 17 In view of the diverse results, the aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the healing of bone defects (fresh extraction sockets) following implant installation with flap elevation and primary closure compared to implant installation without flap elevation. A qualitative, semiquantitative and a histomorphometric evaluation were done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%