Volume 3A: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions 2022
DOI: 10.1115/gt2022-80577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Flame Describing Functions Measured in Single and Multiple Injector Configurations

Abstract: Recent investigations of combustion instabilities in annular systems indicate that considerable insight may be gained by using information gathered in single-sector experiments. Such experiments are, for example, employed to measure flame describing functions (FDFs), which represent the flame response to incident perturbations. These data may be used in combination with low-order models to interpret instabilities in multiple injector annular systems. It is known, however, that the structure and dynamical behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rig comprises a cylindrical quartz chamber with an inner diameter of 69 mm, allowing optical access to the flame region, and is operated with the same injectors as MICCA-Spray. Although the wall-bounded flames in SICCA-Spray do not exactly represent the flames of MICCA-Spray, where each flame is surrounded by other flames, it is concluded in a later investigation that they approximately represent the flame dynamics in MICCA-Spray to a reasonable degree [34]. This conclusion relies on a comparison between the single injector configuration and a newly developed threeinjector linear test rig TICCA-Spray, where the central flame is surrounded by two side flames and more closely resembles the MICCA-Spray environment.…”
Section: Flame Describing Functions and Their Impactmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The rig comprises a cylindrical quartz chamber with an inner diameter of 69 mm, allowing optical access to the flame region, and is operated with the same injectors as MICCA-Spray. Although the wall-bounded flames in SICCA-Spray do not exactly represent the flames of MICCA-Spray, where each flame is surrounded by other flames, it is concluded in a later investigation that they approximately represent the flame dynamics in MICCA-Spray to a reasonable degree [34]. This conclusion relies on a comparison between the single injector configuration and a newly developed threeinjector linear test rig TICCA-Spray, where the central flame is surrounded by two side flames and more closely resembles the MICCA-Spray environment.…”
Section: Flame Describing Functions and Their Impactmentioning
confidence: 89%