2005
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.43.8.3615-3623.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Five Repetitive-Sequence-Based PCR Typing Methods for Molecular Discrimination of Salmonella enterica Isolates

Abstract: Five repetitive-element PCR (rep-PCR) techniques [primer sets ERIC1R-ERIC2 and REP1R-REP2I and primers ERIC2, BOXA1R, and (GTG) 5 ] were evaluated for the discrimination of Salmonella enterica isolates at the serotype level. On the basis of number, even distribution over the whole fingerprint, and clarity of bands in the fingerprints, the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) primer set and the (GTG) 5 primer were chosen for use in the following experiments. For these two primer sets, reproduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these authors did not specify which Salmonella serovars were tested, and probably they analyzed serovars with more genetic variance as compared to Enteritidis. A high discriminatory power also was found by Rasschaert et al (2005), since divided 13 S. Enteritidis into six clusters using the same ERIC primer set used in the present study. However, the differences found in the fingerprints of these strains consisted in bands of different intensity at 2000 bp, a size that was not analyzed in the present study, because bands larger than about 1500 bp displayed low resolution power in our experiments, what can explain the differences from our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, these authors did not specify which Salmonella serovars were tested, and probably they analyzed serovars with more genetic variance as compared to Enteritidis. A high discriminatory power also was found by Rasschaert et al (2005), since divided 13 S. Enteritidis into six clusters using the same ERIC primer set used in the present study. However, the differences found in the fingerprints of these strains consisted in bands of different intensity at 2000 bp, a size that was not analyzed in the present study, because bands larger than about 1500 bp displayed low resolution power in our experiments, what can explain the differences from our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The similarities and differences in the ERIC-PCR banding patterns were analyzed by using Quantity-One software, version 4.5.2 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The banding patterns were compared only for isolates that were processed in the same PCR run (26,33). Three stages of comparison were monitored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA fingerprints were compared by visual inspection. RAPD patterns were regarded as different if there were different bands on visual inspection (10,12,21).…”
Section: Bacterial Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%