1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(97)00369-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of five methods for the study of drug–protein binding in affinity capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
223
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
223
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method can be applied over a very wide pH range (pH [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and be operated with aqueous media. Therefore, CE is suited to study almost any biomolecular interaction system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The method can be applied over a very wide pH range (pH [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and be operated with aqueous media. Therefore, CE is suited to study almost any biomolecular interaction system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between strong and weak affinity interactions in CE studies does rest not only on a fixed value of the binding constant but also on the experimental setup, primarily on the separation time and buffer conditions [10]. Five CE modes including zone migration CE (CZE), affinity CE (ACE), frontal analysis (FA), Hummel-Dreyer method (HD), and vacancy peak (VP), have been used to determine affinity interactions [11][12][13]. Busch et al [13] have described the methodological differences between them.…”
Section: Five Ce Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are mostly based on the bound and free ligand separation in the condition of equilibrium. Among them there are methods like filtration, precipitation, chromatography which may disturb the mutual equilibrium of the constituents (Busch et al, 1997a). Capillary electrophoresis (CE) has become an important technique for studies of the nature and strength of biological interactions (Š olté s, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%