2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-016-0493-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of five gridded precipitation products at climatological scales over West Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly rainfall data used in this study consist of datasets from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) Time Series (TS) (CRU TS 4.01) [36], Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) version 7 [37], and University of Delaware (UDEL) version 3.01, all at 0.5 • × 0.5 • . These products are widely used over West Africa owing to their high temporal and spatial resolution, and they have been highlighted as one of the best substitutes for rain-gauge rainfall data over West Africa [12]. Also the monthly pressure level vertical velocity, specific humidity, divergence, and zonal and meridional wind dataset used in this study was obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis dataset [38]…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monthly rainfall data used in this study consist of datasets from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) Time Series (TS) (CRU TS 4.01) [36], Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) version 7 [37], and University of Delaware (UDEL) version 3.01, all at 0.5 • × 0.5 • . These products are widely used over West Africa owing to their high temporal and spatial resolution, and they have been highlighted as one of the best substitutes for rain-gauge rainfall data over West Africa [12]. Also the monthly pressure level vertical velocity, specific humidity, divergence, and zonal and meridional wind dataset used in this study was obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis dataset [38]…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also observed is that the regions of highest rainfall coincide with regions of high topography (i.e., Fouta Djallon highland, Jos Plateau, and the Cameroonian mountains), and the highest variability as depicted by the coefficient of variation in Figure 2b,d,f is evident within the central Guinea coast subregion (i.e., Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Togo, Benin, and western Nigeria). In contrast, the Sahel (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) • N, 20 • W-20 • E) subregion receives comparatively little rainfall (~5 mm day -1 ). Significant agreement can be found among the three gridded rainfall observations, although with noticeable differences.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Distributions Of Summer Rainfall Over Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue is related to the rainfall gauge network in Africa having one of the lowest densities among all the continents, except for Antarctica [33]. In West Africa, the gauge network distribution is sparse and thus challenging due to the complex and non-uniform topography [34]. As suggested by Maidment et al [35], rainfall estimates derived from satellite imagery, reanalysis, and the numerical weather prediction (NWP) model outputs are of greater importance in such areas.…”
Section: Observation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult to directly compare these studies because of varying methodologies, reference datasets, and region of interests, there is some general consensus on its performance. Some of these studies report on seasonal to decadal differences [16,19,20], an underestimation of heavy rainfall [19,21], and a lower bias in gauge-calibrated than in non-calibrated satellite-based datasets [16,18]. Furthermore, Dembélé and Zwart [19] provided specific application-related recommendations of the datasets based, among others on their tendency to under-and over-estimate rainfall events, which and desired for drought and flood monitoring, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%